Undisclosed profit and unaccounted investment in undervalued ...

High Court Confirms Tribunal's Decision: No Substantial Question of Law on Undisclosed Profit and Unaccounted Investment Additions.

September 1, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Undisclosed profit and unaccounted investment in undervalued goods - It was observed by the Tribunal that when the very basis on which the addition was made by the Assessing Officer stands deleted by the CESTAT in appeal preferred by the assessee, the addition based on their information does not survive and hence, the CIT(Appeals) has rightly deleted the addition on account of unaccounted investment and Gross profit. No substantial question of law. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Undisclosed profit and unaccounted investment in undervalued ...

High Court Confirms Tribunal's Decision: No Substantial Question of Law on Undisclosed Profit and Unaccounted Investment Additions.

September 1, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

Substantial question of law to be made out u/s 260A or not? - Undisclosed income surrendered during the Search and Seizure action - to be taxed at normal rate or tax...

The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

Tribunal and CIT(A) concurred that Assessing Officer (AO) did not record any finding of undisclosed investment discovered during Excise Department's search, merely...

Jurisdiction of civil court u/s 34 of SARFAESI Act was in question. Suit for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction was rejected by lower courts under Order...

The case pertains to additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of bogus share application money and commission for bogus accommodation entries. The ITAT deleted...

Addition u/s 68 - substantial question of law - The Supreme court has held that, the jurisdiction of the High Court to interfere with the orders passed by the Courts...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

Revision u/s 263 challenged for lack of proper inquiry by Assessing Officer regarding cash deposits during demonetization, scrap sales, and non-submission of audit...

Substantial question of law to be made u/s 260A - prerequisite of admission of the appeal before the High court - The ITAT hold that the assessee had correctly offered...

Undisclosed income of the assessee for the purpose of Chapter XIV B of the Income Tax Act - when section 158BB(3) is read with section 158B(b), which defines undisclosed...

The HC held that the Tribunal's decision deleting the addition u/s 68 was justified as the assessee had discharged its burden of substantiating the identity,...

The High Court upheld the CESTAT's order setting aside the confiscation order and imposition of redemption fines under the Customs Act, 1962. The appeals did not involve...

Reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the belief that the assessee failed to disclose all material facts necessary for completing the assessment u/s 143(3) of...

Quick Updates: