Reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the belief that ...

Income Tax reassessment upheld due to non-disclosure of material facts by assessee.

September 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the belief that the assessee failed to disclose all material facts necessary for completing the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellate Tribunal, being the ultimate fact-finding authority, upheld the Assessing Officer's decision to reopen the assessment, concluding that the assessee did not furnish the required information. The High Court held that no substantial question of law arises for consideration, as the Appellate Tribunal's factual findings cannot be disturbed u/s 260A, which is limited to substantial questions of law. The Appellate Tribunal's role as the ultimate fact-finding authority was affirmed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Reassessment proceedings were initiated based on the belief that ...

Income Tax reassessment upheld due to non-disclosure of material facts by assessee.

September 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The High Court held that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Revenue were invalid due to the absence of any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose...

The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

HC quashed reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 after expiry of 4-year limitation period. Court found no failure by assessee to disclose material facts...

Reopening of assessment after four years is invalid as the recorded reasons do not mention any failure by the assessee to fully and truly disclose all material facts...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee filed return of income in response to notice u/s 148 - No difference between returned income and assessed income - Assessee voluntarily...

Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

Reopening of assessment - reason to believe - The Court evaluates the concept of "true and full disclosure" as mandated by Section 147, considering relevant legal...

The High Court held that the jurisdictional facts necessary to invoke Section 147 for reassessment were absent. The reassessment was initiated after the four-year...

Interest u/s 234C - interest for deferment of advance tax - If on a particular due date for payment of advance tax, the facts show that there is no liability to pay...

Duty of AO to Guide the Assessee - Considering the specific facts on record that the assessee is non resident the amount which the ld. AO has taxed is earned and sourced...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal against the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the four-year period. The Assessing Officer failed to record a finding that the...

The Department initiated the case based on income tax documents, which were public documents, and the presumption is on their truthfulness. The difference in value based...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Quick Updates: