Extended period of limitation - the fact remains that appellant ...

Appellant's Attempt to Evade Time-Barred Demand Fails Due to Suppression of Information from the Department.

September 3, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Extended period of limitation - the fact remains that appellant has not provided the data and is now trying to profit from its own inaction to claim that the demand is time-barred. Therefore, the appellant had actually suppressed the information from the Department and now cannot benefit by claiming that the demand is time-barred. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Extended period of limitation - the fact remains that appellant ...

Appellant's Attempt to Evade Time-Barred Demand Fails Due to Suppression of Information from the Department.

September 3, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Extended period of limitation - suppression of facts - Claiming SSI exemption - Suppression of turnover - As the demand is based on the basis of information appearing in...

Extended Period of Limitation - Suppression etc. cannot be imputed against the appellant merely because they failed to pay the tax on time. It is settled legal position...

Extended period of limitation - Mere omission to give correct information is not a suppression of fact unless it was deliberate to stop the payment of duty - entire...

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing SS Hose Assembly, Flange & Fittings, also procured MS Round, TMT Bars, etc., performed work on them, and cleared them to buyers...

Demand of customs duty invoking extended period of limitation - the Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided all relevant information and documents at the time of...

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding service tax recovery for 2011-2012. The demand for April-September 2011 was time-barred, exceeding even the extended...

Construction of Residential Complex Service - for the entire period from 31 July, 2010 to 31 March, 2015, appellant never paid due service tax on due date - the...

Appellant provided services of loading, unloading, shifting, and transportation of iron ore under separate contracts. CESTAT held it was a composite service for...

The appellant manufactured polyester staple fiber (PSF) using PET bottles scrap (90%) and popcorn waste (less than 10%). The department denied the nil/concessional duty...

The appellant classified goods, gears for rotary tiller and parts of rotary tiller, under central excise sub-heading 82349090 instead of heading 848340000. The demand...

CESTAT NEW DELHI held that the appellant mis-declared quantity and quality, overvalued goods, and failed to comply with Advance Authorization requirements. Allegations...

10kg of gold consisting of 10 gold bars, with 7 bars bearing foreign markings and 3 bars without markings, was seized along with cash from an employee of the appellant....

The appellant manufactured 'Gold Dore Bars' having purity less than 95% from gold ore/concentrate and claimed exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-CE as 'Gold Bars'....

The appellants' services of promotion and marketing of films' music and song video rights acquired from Film Production Companies (FPCs) do not constitute 'Business...

Quick Updates: