Extended period of limitation - Mere omission to give correct ...

Omission of Correct Info Isn't Suppression Unless Intentional; Demand Time-Barred Under Extended Limitation Rules in Excise Law Case.

May 2, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Extended period of limitation - Mere omission to give correct information is not a suppression of fact unless it was deliberate to stop the payment of duty - entire demand is time barred - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Extended period of limitation - Mere omission to give correct ...

Omission of Correct Info Isn't Suppression Unless Intentional; Demand Time-Barred Under Extended Limitation Rules in Excise Law Case.

May 2, 2017

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Service tax demand on Goods Transport Agency (GTA) services rendered on reverse charge basis set aside as appellant did not collect service tax from service recipient....

The appellant, engaged in manufacturing SS Hose Assembly, Flange & Fittings, also procured MS Round, TMT Bars, etc., performed work on them, and cleared them to buyers...

The appellant classified goods, gears for rotary tiller and parts of rotary tiller, under central excise sub-heading 82349090 instead of heading 848340000. The demand...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed issues regarding the method of valuation of electrical motors, whether to apply Rule 8 or Rule 4 of the Central Excise (Valuation)...

Rejection of cross objections as time barred - in the Act, no such time period is prescribed. Time fixed by the learned Appellate Authority was fixed by him and there...

The appellant manufactured 'Gold Dore Bars' having purity less than 95% from gold ore/concentrate and claimed exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-CE as 'Gold Bars'....

Appellant provided services of loading, unloading, shifting, and transportation of iron ore under separate contracts. CESTAT held it was a composite service for...

Extended period of limitation - the fact remains that appellant has not provided the data and is now trying to profit from its own inaction to claim that the demand is...

Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in Tax Auditor's report. Demand u/s 201(1)/201(14) was barred by limitation. Assessee submitted that...

The case involves a Section 9 application to determine if payment for ten invoices by the Operational Creditor was time-barred and if a preexisting dispute existed. The...

Extended period of limitation - Merely that assessee is PSU is not sufficient to set aside the SCN as being barred by time - SCN not barred by time.

Conduct of Assessment Proceedings electronically in time-barring scrutiny cases - Order u/s 119

Rebate claim – refund claim was time barred - rebate claim was rightly rejected as time barred but the re-credit of duty paid in Cenvat account is not admissible - CGOVT

The High Court held that u/ss 28AA(1) and 28(10) of the Customs Act, there is no requirement for a demand for interest to be made in the original assessment order....

Extended Period of Limitation - Suppression etc. cannot be imputed against the appellant merely because they failed to pay the tax on time. It is settled legal position...

Quick Updates: