Criminal contempt for lowering the authority of this Appellate ...

Appellate Tribunal's Contempt Case Closed for Violating Section 15 Procedure; Most Acts Barred by Section 20 Limitations.

September 3, 2022

Case Laws Companies Law AT

Criminal contempt for lowering the authority of this Appellate Tribunal - In the present contempt case, the procedure contemplated under Section 15 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 has not been complied, consequently, the Contempt Case is liable to be closed as cognizance was taken in violation of mandatary procedure prescribed in Section 15 and major part of alleged acts of contempt are barred by Limitation prescribed by Section 20 of the Act. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Criminal contempt for lowering the authority of this Appellate ...

Appellate Tribunal's Contempt Case Closed for Violating Section 15 Procedure; Most Acts Barred by Section 20 Limitations.

September 3, 2022

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

Contempt proceedings - The Tribunal (NCLT) and the Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) have the same ‘jurisdiction’, ‘powers’ and ‘Authority’ in respect of contempt of it as the...

Contempt of Court / Tribunal - Seeking initiation of contempt proceedings against the Respondents - application u/s 425 of the Companies Act, 2013 - for non-exercising...

Contempt petition - disobedience of NCALT’s order - Appellate Tribunal had allowed the appeal to be withdrawn in view of the consent terms reached between the parties...

Contempt Jurisdiction - ‘Aggrieved’ person - It is for the Tribunal to find out whether its order has been disobeyed in a ‘wilful’ manner and the mental element is to be...

Contempt of Court - willful disobedience - The breach of undertaking amounts to contempt as defined under Section 2 (b) of Contempt of Court Act but a remedy is provided...

The CLB, under Section 10E of the Companies Act, 1956, was found to lack the power to punish for contempt of its order. - The power to punish for contempt of the CLB's...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeals by remanding the matter back to the original authority. The Tribunal held that the...

Fraud - Whether a shareholder, minority or otherwise, can initiate proceedings - for a shareholder to avail a remedy under Section 447 of the Act such shareholder...

The scheme of the Act would not permit the Tribunal to jettison the first appeal before the Commissioner and allow itself to act as first Appellate Authority. If the...

Dismissal of contempt petition - The appellant filed a contempt petition alleging non-compliance with the High Court's order. However, the contempt bench dismissed the...

Guilty u/s 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - deliberate and willful disobedience - If the action of DCIT, Range -2, Lucknow is...

The High Court ruled on the maintainability of appeals under the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004. It held that the obligation to approach the Appellate Tribunal for...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) related to the addition of closing stock. The AO levied penalty on an addition u/s 36(1)(iii) that...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

The appellant's appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal, and the penalty imposed u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was set aside. It was held that when an assessee...

Quick Updates: