Where the assessee has opted not to appear before the ld. Pr. ...

Tribunal Upholds Pr. CIT's Order as Assessee Fails to Provide Transaction Details or Actively Pursue Appeal u/s 263.

September 5, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Where the assessee has opted not to appear before the ld. Pr. CIT nor before this Tribunal and has merely filed the appeal but has not pursued the appeal so filed by it and in the given situation where we are unable to lay our hands on any of the details of the financial transactions carried out by the assessee during the year and whether such transactions have been examined by ld. AO in the manner directed by ld. Pr. CIT passed u/s 263 we fail to find any infirmity in the finding of the ld. Pr. CIT in the impugned order - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Where the assessee has opted not to appear before the ld. Pr. ...

Tribunal Upholds Pr. CIT's Order as Assessee Fails to Provide Transaction Details or Actively Pursue Appeal u/s 263.

September 5, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not...

The assessee had demonstrated the genuineness of the share transaction resulting in long-term capital gains, which were claimed as exempt u/s 10(38). The Revenue...

Addition u/s. 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - The Tribunal found the explanation provided by the assessee regarding the sale consideration for real...

The case pertains to the rejection of provisional registration u/ss 12AB/80G for charitable activities. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) concluded that the assessee...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

Applicability of Section 56(2)(x) and the jurisdiction of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT), Jaipur-1, in revising the order u/s 263. The key points are:...

The ITAT upheld disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D for expenditure on earning exempt income due to lack of fund utilization details. Dismissed appeal as assessee failed to...

Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

The assessee had made purchases from M/s. HJM Fuels Pvt. Ltd., which the Department treated as bogus and added a profit element. The assessee pointed out discrepancies...

The case pertains to the validity of reopening of assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the characterization of short-term capital gains (STCG) from the sale of...

The assessee received Rs. 125 lacs in cash from SGCFCL for facilitation work, which was not recorded in the books. The assessee claimed the amount was paid to 2500...

Transaction value - Valuation (Customs) - Special or abnormal discount to the related buyers which were in excess of 3% discount - The Appellate Tribunal observed that...

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Transfer pricing adjustment - assessee advanced interest free loan to its AE - The Tribunal noted that the assessee had disclosed all...

Quick Updates: