Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2022 Year 2022 This

Levy of penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act 1962 - Smuggling from ...


Penalty Under Customs Act Section 117 Invalidated: Silence Alone Not Enough Evidence for Smuggling Allegations.

September 21, 2022

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Levy of penalty u/s 117 of the Customs Act 1962 - Smuggling from Dubai - Gold Bars - the ground on which the penalty has been imposed on Appellant i.e he was keeping silent about the illicit activities of Accused, is not a valid ground for imposition of penalty under Section 117 of the Customs Act. No other evidence attributing knowledge or intention on the part of the Appellant has been relied upon. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  2. Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

  3. CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

  4. Confiscating absolutely seven gold bars having foreign make marking - Smuggling - Hyundai Verna Car - sufficient evidence to prove foreign origin goods - The Tribunal...

  5. Imposition of penalty - section 112(b) of Customs Act - smuggling - diamonds - The active role of these Appellant, do not justify imposition of heavy penalty under...

  6. Proof of smuggling of goods - DW.1 (revenue officer) stated in evidence that it was suspected that articles were smuggled and that it was believed that the articles were...

  7. Seizure - Burden of proof - ‘reasonable belief’ - Onus for proving the goods to be not smuggled - Seizure outside the ‘customs area’ - The Tribunal noted that the burden...

  8. Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - gold biscuits of foreign origin - demand merely on the basis of the statements of the employees of the...

  9. Smuggling - burden to prove - invocation of Section 123 - the statement recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 made before the customs officers is not a...

  10. Smuggling - Gold bars - concealment in the baggage - the applicant crossed the green channel without declaring the impugned articles in his possession in the Customs...

  11. Smuggling - Prohibited goods - confiscation of cigarettes containers concealed in HDPE granules - Penalty u/s 112 (a) &(b) and 114AA - The Appellate Tribunal upheld the...

  12. Levy of penalty u/s 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - The reason for imposing the impugned penalty is that the appellant has not verified the Let Export...

  13. CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the confiscation order and penalty regarding an allegedly smuggled motorcycle. The Tribunal determined Hyderabad...

  14. Interpretation of statute - Section 108 as well as Section 114(i) of the Customs Act, 1962 - smuggling - psychotropic substance - Alprazolam - fictitious and...

  15. Levy of penalty u/s 114 (i) of the Customs Act, 1962 on Merchant Exporter - smuggling of Red Sanders - No evidence put forth as regards antecedents of the exporter of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates