Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2022 Year 2022 This

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - re-export of goods - ...


Misdeclaration of Goods: Penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act Reduced from Rs. 7 Lakhs to Rs. 2 Lakhs.

September 27, 2022

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Levy of redemption fine and penalty - re-export of goods - misdeclaration of goods - the penalty imposed under Section 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 is proper. However, the penalty of Rs.7 lakhs appears to be on a higher side. The penalty calls for reduction and it is reduced to Rs. 2 lakhs - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

  2. Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

  3. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

  4. Seizure of Gold Bars - Confiscation - Penalty u/s 112(b) - The case involves the interception of the Appellant carrying 17 pieces of gold of foreign origin in Kolkata....

  5. CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

  6. Levy of penalty of IEC code holder and middleman - Allowing third party to use its IEC code - Bonafide Belief - Misdeclaration of imported goods by third party - There...

  7. Appellant imported fermented and dried processed Sumatra cocoa beans which failed to conform to IS 8865:2003 standards as per FSSAI and BIS testing. Adjudicating...

  8. The CESTAT allowed the appeal against confiscation of goods (Rahar Dal and Urad valued at Rs.7,65,000/-) and penalty imposed by the Department. It observed that the...

  9. Warehoused goods - warehousing period expired - goods (wine) was rendered unfit for human consumption - relinquishment to the title to goods - The appellant is not...

  10. CESTAT overturned confiscation and penalties regarding imported data processing servers. The tribunal distinguished servers from automatic data processing machines,...

  11. Penalty imposed u/s 112a(ii) of Customs Act for smuggling through mis-declaration and undervaluation. Extent of duty evasion uncertain but forensic evidence established...

  12. Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

  13. Misdeclaration of imported goods - Bitumen - Country of Origin - Redemption fine - Levy of penalty - The department was well within its right to seize the goods for such...

  14. Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) and u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abetment in undervaluation - evasion of Customs Duty by several syndicates of crane...

  15. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s order deleting the penalty levied by the AO u/s 271DA for alleged violation of Section 269ST. The ITAT observed that the AO had aggregated...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates