Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2022 Year 2022 This

Erroneous orders of GST officers - hese acts/omissions of ...


High Court Fines GST Officer Rs. 10,000 for Issuing Erroneous Orders, Highlighting Burden on Courts and Public Hardship.

October 6, 2022

Case Laws     GST     HC

Erroneous orders of GST officers - hese acts/omissions of Respondents’ officers is adding to the already overburdened dockets of the Court. Valuable judicial time is wasted because such unacceptable orders are being passed by Respondents’ officers. The officers do not seem to understand or appreciate the hardship that is caused to the general public. - Cost of Rs. 10000/- imposed on GST officer. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Appellant failed to submit required documents within stipulated time for provisional duty assessment, contravening Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations,...

  2. The petitioner issued two post-dated cheques bearing No. 622623 for Rs. 93,00,000/- and No. 622624 for Rs. 1,54,00,000/- to the respondent as per a Deed of Undertaking....

  3. Petitioner pre-deposited Rs. 6,25,000/- as condition for filing appeal u/s 51 of TNVAT Act against Assessment Order dated 21.10.2010. After revised Assessment Order on...

  4. The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

  5. Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

  6. Reduction of issued, subscribed, and paid-up equity share capital u/s 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. Compliance with Sections 66(1), 66(2), and 66(3) satisfied....

  7. HC addressed valuation dispute regarding exported Printed Circuit Boards where penalty was significantly increased from Rs.1,00,000 to Rs.1,00,00,000 in subsequent...

  8. The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

  9. The key points covered in the legal document are: 1. It introduces new forms (GST SPL-01 to GST SPL-08) for taxpayers to apply for waiver of interest and penalty u/s...

  10. Seeking release of detained goods and vehicle - generation of second E-way bill - The action of the GST officers in seizing the goods in question is evidently an act of...

  11. CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

  12. The CESTAT held that the imported betel nuts were rightly classified under CTH 0802 8030. While the minimum import price fixed by DGFT could not be treated as tariff...

  13. Amendment to rules governing salary, allowances and service conditions of Chairperson and members of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. Key changes: Chairperson's...

  14. The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

  15. The HC allowed the petition and quashed the order rejecting the petitioner's refund claim of Rs. 40,00,000 deposited voluntarily by mistake. The HC held that the amount...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates