Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2022 Year 2022 This

Levy of penalty on steamer agent - Undeclared consignment - ...

Case Laws     Customs

October 29, 2022

Levy of penalty on steamer agent - Undeclared consignment - iolation of conditions / instructions contained in the Board Circular - Revenue has not whispered anywhere if it was the duty of the Steamer Agent to seek clearance of any goods since it is the importer who is required to fulfil any obligations ‘at the time of clearance of goods’ - The penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, as levied and confirmed on the appellant, is not sustainable - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 112(b) of Customs Act challenged due to lack of proper evidence. Appellant obtained PNR movement documents from steamer agent for cargo movement from...

  2. Levy of penalty equal to 200% - Detention of consignments - quantity of the boxes were lesser than the quantity shown in the document - levying penalty on the entire...

  3. Demurrage charges - once consignment is handed over to the Port Trust by the steamer agents, duly endorsing the bill of lading or issuing the delivery order but the...

  4. Levy of penalty - hort-landing of goods loaded in a conveyance for importation into India - Prima facie there appears to be a practice of holding an enquiry to ascertain...

  5. Steamer agent services - port service - unless the appellant was actually rendering steamer agent service, there was no question of levying Service Tax under this heading. - AT

  6. Leviability of service tax - clearing and forwarding agent service - although the appellant had entered into the consignment agency agreement with TSL this agreement was...

  7. Levy of penalty on Customs Broker u/s 112 (a) of the Customs Act, 1962 - It was alleged that the appellant dealt with unauthorized person instead of dealing with the...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

  9. Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

  10. Import of Toys - Import policy - Wither the goods are excluded under the scope of BIS, the testing of the same could be made mandatory - the testing procedures have to...

  11. Steamer Agent Service - services were rendered to a shipping line and payment was received from shipping line. That being the case, prima facie, the demand under the...

  12. The case involved the classification of imported consignments u/s CTH 5903 or CTH 5407. CESTAT held that goods were not classifiable u/s CTH 54071094. No...

  13. Penalty on CHA - There was a serious lapse on part of the CHA in verifying the KYC before taking up the Custom clearance of consignment of rough diamond - levy of...

  14. Levy of penalty - there is change in opinion and basis for levy of penalty for concealment varies - there is no merit in levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the...

  15. Classification of services - discount received against their own export consignment from the shipping agents - the appellant has not rendered any services of clearing...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates