TP adjustment - Comparability - Functional dissimilarity - there ...

Transfer Pricing Adjustment: M/s Asco (India) Ltd. Not Comparable Due to Functional Differences in Manufacturing Processes.

December 6, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

TP adjustment - Comparability - Functional dissimilarity - there is wide difference in the functions of a manufacturer and assembler. It is further stated that the assessee’s hydraulic products used fluids for movement of parts of a system. M/s Asco (India) Ltd. manufacturers Nuematic products which use Air as a medium for movement of parts of a system. - Asco (India) Ltd. could not be functionally comparable with the assessee and hence it cannot be considered as comparable company in the hands of the assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

TP adjustment - Comparability - Functional dissimilarity - there ...

Transfer Pricing Adjustment: M/s Asco (India) Ltd. Not Comparable Due to Functional Differences in Manufacturing Processes.

December 6, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Comparable selection for transfer pricing adjustment in the Information Process Management (IPM) segment was examined. UB Engineering Ltd. with negative operating margin...

Transfer pricing adjustment regarding inclusion of E4e Healthcare as a comparable company. Assessee objected due to unavailability of annual report. However, objections...

ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and Tech. Mahindra Ltd.) from the comparable array in transfer pricing adjustment....

Tribunal held that Vishal Information Technologies Ltd. and Nucleus Net soft & GIS (India) Ltd. should be excluded from comparable selection for determining arm's length...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the export commission paid by the assessee to foreign agents in Korea and Indonesia for sales, marketing, and customer...

Transfer pricing adjustment - Purchase of goods from Associated Enterprises (AE) - Most Appropriate Method (MAM) - Resale Price Method (RPM) considered as MAM for...

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

Transfer pricing adjustment on equity broking services (non-DVP segment/CH settlement) rejected due to negligible difference of 0.01% after considering cost adjustment...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

TP adjustment on interest on advances given to AEs - LIBOR + 260 basis points - the transactions of loans advanced to AEs by the assessee was adequately demonstrated by...

Determination of arm's length price (ALP) for international transactions, focusing on the selection of comparable companies. It excludes companies like Elofic Industries...

ITAT ruled on several transfer pricing adjustments in the comparable selection process. The Tribunal excluded Cosmic Global for failing the 75% export sales filter and...

Transfer pricing adjustment for software development and related support services - Comparables deselected due to functional dissimilarity. TPO directed to exclude...

The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata...

ITAT directed exclusion of several comparables for transfer pricing adjustments in software development services (Infosys Ltd, Persistent Systems Ltd, Tata Elexi Ltd,...

Quick Updates: