ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve ...

Transfer Pricing: Four Companies Excluded from Comparable Array Due to Acquisitions and Rule 10B(4) Compliance Issues

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve Ltd., Infosys BPO Ltd., and Tech. Mahindra Ltd.) from the comparable array in transfer pricing adjustment. Two entities (Infosys BPO and Tech Mahindra) underwent extraordinary acquisitions within the prescribed two-year period under Rule 10B(4) and failed to meet the related party transaction filter of less than 25%. The tribunal rejected Revenue's argument regarding turnover filter, citing Bombay HC precedent in Pentair Water India Pvt. Ltd. case which had previously upheld exclusion based on turnover filter. ITAT directed TPO to recompute transfer pricing adjustment excluding all four entities, noting that assessee's IT-enabled services segment remained unchanged across assessment years 2010-11 to 2013-14.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT excluded four entities (Eclerx Services Ltd., TCS E-serve ...

Transfer Pricing: Four Companies Excluded from Comparable Array Due to Acquisitions and Rule 10B(4) Compliance Issues

March 1, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

Transfer pricing adjustment made to alleged international transaction of AMP expenditure incurred by assessee disallowed due to lack of evidence that assessee agreed to...

Arm's Length Price adjustment on international transaction – selection of comparable - if abnormal loss making companies are excluded abnormal profit making companies...

Transfer pricing adjustment regarding inclusion of E4e Healthcare as a comparable company. Assessee objected due to unavailability of annual report. However, objections...

Tribunal held that Vishal Information Technologies Ltd. and Nucleus Net soft & GIS (India) Ltd. should be excluded from comparable selection for determining arm's length...

Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments - Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments - debar of deduction u/s 10A on addition income assessed u/s 92CD as per the Proviso to 92C(4) -...

TP adjsutment - “AE” investment banking activities - comparable selection - The persistence loss- making company are normally excluded as comparable. As per the...

The Appellate Tribunal ruled on Transfer Pricing Adjustment, excluding companies with high turnover from comparables. Companies like Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd., Tata...

Transfer pricing adjustment rejected assessee's comparable companies in TP study analysis. Directed TPO to examine if companies are functionally comparable, apply...

Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

The Tribunal held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)/Assessing Officer (AO) should exclude companies having turnover exceeding Rs. 200 crores from the comparability...

Suspicious transfers - Illegal transfer of shares - This is the vital column and the said column is blank. Further there is no signature of witness on the said SH-4 form....

Companies are required to file Form CSR-2 separately on or before December 31, 2024, after filing Form AOC-4, AOC-4-NBFC (Ind AS), or AOC-4 XBRL for the financial year...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the export commission paid by the assessee to foreign agents in Korea and Indonesia for sales, marketing, and customer...

TP adjustment - comparable selection - functinal dissimilarity - media content and TV broadcasting are totally dissimilar activities - not at all comparable - AO/ TPO to...

Quick Updates: