Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2022 Year 2022 This

Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of ...


Penalties Upheld for Direct Involvement in Fraudulent Cenvat Credit u/r 26, Central Excise Act 2002.

December 9, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Levy of penalty Rule 26 of Central Excise Act, 2002 - charge of abatement in the offence of fraudulent availment of cenvat credit - All the appellant having direct and active role in entire modus operandi of wrong availment of cenvat credit by the manufacturer - Therefore, the penalties imposed on the appellant is correct hence, the same is upheld. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent passing of cenvat Credit - it is clearly established that the appellant has facilitated by only issuing...

  2. Imposition of penalty under Rule 26 (2) of CER - availment of irregular CENVAT Credit - invoices without actual receipt of inputs - Though the opting of SVLDRS should...

  3. Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

  4. Levy of penalty personal penalty on Broker u/r 26 of CER - abetment in availment of inadmissible CENVAT Credit - From the statements it has been proved beyond any doubt...

  5. Imposition of penalty u/r 26 - wrongly passing of fraudulent cenvat credit - Issuance of cenvatable invoices without supply of goods for passing out fraudulent credit -...

  6. Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been...

  7. Levy of penalty u/r 26(1) for abatement - it is clear that all the appellants were indulged in abating the manufacturer for fraudulent availment of Cenvat credit...

  8. Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

  9. Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Knowing the activities of supplier they made a false representation to the authorities to...

  10. Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

  11. Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

  12. Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

  13. Penalty - CENVAT credit on G.T.A. - CENVAT Credit received and utilized both for traded as well as manufactured goods were duly accounted for in the CENVAT Credit...

  14. The CESTAT upheld the denial of CENVAT credit on inputs used for laying foundations or making support structures for capital goods, as per the revised definition of...

  15. Appellants duly followed procedure and conditions for CENVAT credit under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 and filed revised returns. Section 142(9)(b) of CGST Act, 2017...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates