Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2022 Year 2022 This

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - AO referred the valuation of ...


Property Valuation Assessed as Income u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) by AO Based on DVO's Report.

December 15, 2022

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - AO referred the valuation of property to Valuation Cell and DVO - difference between the DVO value and consideration paid for purchase of property should be assessed as income of the purchasers in terms of s 56(2)(vii)(b) - AO after considering relevant facts has rightly made addition towards differential consideration u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an...

  2. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii) r.w.s. 69 - difference between the purchase price i.e. circle rate/stamp duty value and the value determined by the DVO - This section can be...

  3. The assessee disputed the stamp duty value of land purchased, leading to the matter being referred to the District Valuation Officer (DVO). The DVO's valuation, based on...

  4. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - difference pointed out by the DVO in his valuation report - There should be a live link between the material coming to the notice of...

  5. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - difference between the stamp duty value and the actual purchase consideration - - DVO has given due consideration for the location of the...

  6. The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

  7. Assessee issued shares at fair market value computed as per Rule 11UA(2), but Assessing Officer (AO) and CIT(A) rejected valuation without justification. Statute...

  8. Addition u/s 56(2)(vii b) - value the equity shares using DCF Method - the Lower Authorities ought to have considered the valuation report of the Chartered Accountant...

  9. HC quashed orders rejecting assessee's request for revision u/s 264. Differential value between sale deed and stamp duty valuation exceeded Rs. 50,000, invoking Section...

  10. The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to compute the assessee's income by adding the difference in valuation of shares u/s 56(2)(viib)....

  11. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for the difference between the market value and consideration received for shares...

  12. Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Method of Valuation - share premium receipts - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had obtained a valuation report from a registered valuer,...

  13. Enhancement made by the Ld. CIT(A) u/s 251(1) r.w.s. 56(2) (viib) - AO substituted fair market value determined by the assessee through his own valuation - Assessees...

  14. Validity of valuation u/s 56(2)(viib) was questioned. The Assessing Officer rejected the assessee's valuation report and framed the order based on actual figures, which...

  15. Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide findings for rejecting assessee's claim of exemption as a startup from applicability of section...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates