The assessee disputed the stamp duty value of land purchased, ...

Taxpayer's land purchase value disputed, District Valuation Officer's valuation upheld for stamp duty.

December 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

The assessee disputed the stamp duty value of land purchased, leading to the matter being referred to the District Valuation Officer (DVO). The DVO's valuation, based on comparable cases not objected by the assessee, was adopted as the assessee had not provided any other registered valuer's report. The CIT(A) upheld the addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii) for the difference between purchase price and DVO's valuation, as the assessee failed to controvert the findings. The ITAT found no merit in the assessee's grounds and upheld the CIT(A)'s order, deciding against the assessee and confirming the addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b)(ii).

View Source

← Previous Next →

The assessee disputed the stamp duty value of land purchased, ...

Taxpayer's land purchase value disputed, District Valuation Officer's valuation upheld for stamp duty.

December 7, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee purchased agricultural land whose stamp duty valuation was lower than the actual purchase consideration. The authorities sought to invoke section 56(2)(x)...

Difference between purchase value and value determined by District Valuation Officer though more than 5% but below 10% of purchase consideration, transacted amount...

u/s 56(2)(vii)(b), the addition was made based on the difference between the stated value and the District Valuation Officer's (DVO) valuation. It was held that an...

The assessee objected to the valuation report prepared by the district valuation officer and the stamp duty rate. The assessing officer referred the matter to the...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - purchase of immovable property on less than stamp duty value - it was incumbent upon the AO to refer the matter to the District Valuation Officer

Unexplained investment in purchase land - on-money payment - The addition is also not based on valuation of land by any registered valuer. The addition is also not based...

Income from other sources u/s 56 (2) (x) - purchased the property - difference between the valuation adopted by the district valuation officer and actual consideration -...

The ITAT adjudicated on the following issues: 1. Cost of acquisition for computing long-term capital gains on sale of ancestral agricultural land: The assessee's...

Excess premium charged on issue of shares u/s.56(2)(viib) - The value adopted by the Assessing Officer under net asset value method even though a prescribed method does...

CIT(A) determined profit at 5.47% on total purchases. Assessee produced sufficient evidence regarding purchases, movement of goods, GST payment on transportation,...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for the difference between the market value and consideration received for shares...

The case pertains to the rejection of self-assessed value of imported aluminium scrap and determination of the method for valuation. The key points are: rejection of the...

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - difference in the market value and issued value of shares - assessee had established through various evidences submitted during appeal...

Long Term Capital Gains - valuation u/s 50C - commercial property or residential property - the Assessing officer at most, can have referred the matter to the District...

Determination of value u/s 50C - Validity of order of CIT(A) directing the AO to recalculate the capital gain on sale of land taking total value of property of Rs. 6.05...

Quick Updates: