Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The fact remains that the specific ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 26, 2022

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The fact remains that the specific issue mentioned and has been examined and the contention of the assessee accepted by the Assessing Officer. Merely because the Assessing Officer did not write specific reasons for accepting the explanation of the assessee cannot be reason enough to invoke powers under section 263, and non-mentioning of these reasons do not render the assessment order "erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue". - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The fact remains that the specific ...

Case Laws Income Tax

December 26, 2022

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - The fact remains that the specific issue raised, in the revision order was specifically looked into, detailed submissions were made and these...

Reopening of assessment - the formation of opinion without examining the issue (as according to the Assessing Officer, the issue is yet to be examined and the notice...

Revision u/s 263 - once the AO cannot examine any other issue except the issue as selected for limited scrutiny assessment, the PCIT can examine the only issue which was...

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT observed that AO had failed to examine and verify the issues related to share premium received and interest earned, which issues had remained...

Revision u/s 263 - the AO also mentioned in the order that “The Documents as submitted by the assessee were examined and placed on record”, however no remark on the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed several issues. Firstly, regarding the impact of pay revision of executives, it was held that the provision made by the assessee company...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - As per PCIT AO fails to examine the issue on increase in share premium in light of provisions of section 56(2)(vii), although, the assessee has...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - When the case of the assessee was selected under CASS to examine the capital gains then the AO was required to examine the case meticulously on...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Whether assessment order has been made subject matter of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, the ld. Pr.CIT cannot exercise jurisdiction u/s 263 ? - since...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving a revision u/s 263 regarding the validity of a Limited scrutiny Assessment. The PCIT observed that the AO did not...

Cancellation of petitioner's registration - vague SCN - The particulars such as designation and office of the issuing authority are also not mentioned in the show-cause...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - buy back of its own shares - The fact remains that the factum of extinguishment of the purchased shares by reducing the paid up capital of the...

Revision u/s 263 - Assessee merely kept referring to the decision that an enquiry was made by the ld. AO and section 263 should not have been invoked. We, however, find...

Notices issued u/ss 84 and 27(1)(a) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 were valid. The time limitation for revising assessment orders is not an issue if a...

Quick Updates: