Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by ...

Amalgamated company wins refund after CIT's initial rejection; erroneous order corrected u/s 237 and 264.

February 7, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by amalgamated company - order of CIT rejecting the application is erroneous - refund allowed u/s 237 - Tri

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision application u/s 264 to get refund - application by ...

Amalgamated company wins refund after CIT's initial rejection; erroneous order corrected u/s 237 and 264.

February 7, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

The ITAT held that since the income of the amalgamating company was included in the amalgamated company's income u/s 199(1) read with Section 198, the credit for TDS and...

Addition u/s 68 - The Tribunal not only took note of the legal position but also the factual position. The Tribunal held that the legal effect after amalgamation of the...

Amalagamtion - Liability of the amalgamating and amalgamated company - Tribunal was not right in holding that the proceedings against the amalgamated company could not...

HC held assessment orders passed in name of amalgamating companies void ab initio, despite participation of amalgamated company (RIL) in proceedings. Revenue authorities...

This case deals with the validity of assessment proceedings initiated against an amalgamated company for the assessment year 2018-19. The key points are: The Assessing...

Validity of reopening of assessment - notice against non existent entity / amalgamated company - Notices issued.

Amalgamated company is entitled to set off and carry forward the brought forward business losses and unabsorbed depreciation of the amalgamating company from the very...

Notice u/s 148 – Notice was issued in the name of amalgamating company which has been merged - the amalgamating company ceased to exist - Notice invalid - AT

Carry forward of investment allowance - unabsorbed depreciation of Amalgamating Company - Section 72A - Claim allowed - HC

Rejection application for Revision u/s 264 in favor of assessee - Rejection on the ground the assessee has filing an appeal u/s 246 which was rejected by the CIT(A) due...

The case pertains to the validity of an assessment order against a company that had already undergone amalgamation. The key points are: The assessment order was passed...

Assessment on amalgamated company – Assessment on a company which has been dissolved by amalgamation u/s 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 is invalid - AT

The High Court addressed the validity of a show cause notice (SCN) and final order issued against a non-existent entity, the rectification of procedural defects, and the...

Validity of assessment order - Amalgamation - transfer pricing order u/s. 92CA(3) was passed against non-est (amalgamated) company - assessment order though passed in...

Assessment order u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) on a non-existing entity - amalgamation of company - The assessment order, referring only to the name of the amalgamating...

Quick Updates: