Buyback offer made by the company in violation of regulatory ...

Case Laws SEBI

February 14, 2023

Buyback offer made by the company in violation of regulatory provisions - role of the Company Secretary, compliance officer - The crucial point which has been missed by the Tribunal is that the compliance officer is also required to ensure compliance with the buyback regulations. Regulation 19(3) of the Regulations expressly so stipulates. Since the interpretation which has been placed by the Tribunal on the interpretation of 19(3) is contrary to the plain terms of Regulation 19(3), matter restored back - SC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Buyback offer made by the company in violation of regulatory ...

Case Laws SEBI

February 14, 2023

You may also like:

Violation of Buyback Regulations and PFUTP Regulations 3 and 4 of the SEBI - There is nothing on record to indicate that the Company instructed the intermediaries to...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viia) - taking fair market value of buy back of shares by assessee from its holding company a company incorporated in USA - the provisions of section...

Interpretation of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which deals with vicarious liability for offenses committed by companies u/s 138 (dishonor of cheques)....

TDS u/s 194A - TDS on deemed dividend - loan advanced by the assessee company to the other group companies - Even if, the appellant company hold 100% shares in these...

Addition in view of the Provisions of section 50C on the Gift of Plots - Transfer of property by a Company as a gift - AO concluded how the gift by one company to other...

Valuation of the fair price per equity share of the Respondent Company - low valuation of shares in the exit offer - Section 247 or other provisions of the Companies Act...

Statutory provisions regarding restoration of a company's name on the Register of Companies maintained by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) u/s 252(1) and 252(3) of the...

TP adjsutment - “AE” investment banking activities - comparable selection - The persistence loss- making company are normally excluded as comparable. As per the...

Addition u/s 68 - Violation of provisions of section 269SS - unexplained cash deposit - Violation of provisions of section 269SS of the I.T.Act calls for penalty u/s...

Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) - claim of interest expenditure - The companies GIL and CNIL are subsidiary companies, which clearly indicates that the investment made by...

Respondents made a concession before the Regulatory Authority to accept interest only on amounts paid after RERA implementation. However, before the Appellate Authority,...

Disallowance on account of provision for expenses made under normal provisions of the Act as well as in the computation of book profits u/s.115JB - The assessee company...

Addition u/s 68 - buyback was not genuine and added back the buyback amount as unexplained income - Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which deals with unexplained...

Role of AO as adjudicator in making the computation - Assessment made u/s 147 r.w.s. 144 and 144B - It is clear that the Parliament intended the AO to be both...

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of an independent director - In absence of any specific averments or allegations carving out a specific role attributable to...

Quick Updates: