Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT-A deleted addition admitting ...
CIT-A's Deletion of Addition Deemed Invalid Due to Rule 46A Violation in Unexplained Investment Case u/s 69.
March 6, 2023
Case Laws Income Tax AT
Unexplained investment u/s 69 - CIT-A deleted addition admitting the additional evidences - ld CIT(A) did not deal with the exceptions of Rule 46A, therefore, ld CIT(A) accepted the additional evidences in violation of Rule 46A of the Rules, which is not tenable in law. - AT
View Source