Non-admission of appeal u/s. 249(4) - The assessee has not paid ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 13, 2023

Non-admission of appeal u/s. 249(4) - The assessee has not paid the taxes on the revised return which was not treated to be valid by the AO and was non-est in law. Since the revised return was treated to be non-est in law, there was no question of making payment of tax on the income declared therein - assessee has already paid the tax on the admitted income declared in the original return filed which was acted upon by the AO for framing the assessment u/s.153C of the Act. In the light of these facts, we are of the view that the CIT(Appeals) was wrong in dismissing the appeal of the assessee. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-admission of appeal u/s. 249(4) - The assessee has not paid ...

Case Laws Income Tax

March 13, 2023

You may also like:

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Return filed was non-est return and not a valid return in the eyes of law as per Section 139(4)- Clause (a) of Explanation 2 would...

Non est TDS return - appeal against charging of interest u/s 234E - fee should be paid u/s 234E before the return of TDS is filed u/s. 200(3) - This provision does not...

Appeal before CIT(A) - Non deposit of admitted tax/advance tax as provided u/s 249(4) - Payment of tax is mandatory but the requirement of paying such tax before filing...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the revised return of income filed by the assessee cannot be treated as invalid by the Assessing Officer (AO). Since the AO...

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

Validity of revised return 139(5) - Revised return did not conform to the prescription of section 139(5), before its substitution w.e.f. A.Y. 2017-18, which provided for...

Income assessed in hands of Appellant as Representative Assessee. No credit for prepaid taxes availed by beneficiaries. JCIT(A) directed AO to verify claim of prepaid...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - belated return u/s 139(4) - Subsequently revised - request of rectification based on revised return - not permissible as belated...

Non considering the revised return filed by the assessee for rectifying the mistake in claim of depreciation - In this case, the original return was not filed under...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Revision petition u/s. 264 - disallowance of carry forward of loss to subsequent years - CIT while disposing of the 264 petition of the assessee, had clearly directed...

The taxpayer filed an original return which was processed by the CPC. Subsequently, a revised return was filed u/s 139(5) with a self-assessment tax of Rs. 10,820/-....

Quick Updates: