Ad-hoc disallowance at the rate of 10% on credit card expenses - ...

Court Rules 10% Credit Card Expense Disallowance Unjustified Due to Lack of Evidence for Personal Use by Assessing Officer.

April 11, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Ad-hoc disallowance at the rate of 10% on credit card expenses - Prima Facie the said disallowance is ad-hoc in nature. AO ought to have made reference to any of such expenses given in the books which could indicate that they are personal in nature. Merely making disallowance just for the sake of concluding the assessment is not a justified approach. Expenses through credit card have been claimed as general business expenditure in order to attend the business meetings. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Ad-hoc disallowance at the rate of 10% on credit card expenses - ...

Court Rules 10% Credit Card Expense Disallowance Unjustified Due to Lack of Evidence for Personal Use by Assessing Officer.

April 11, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Disallowance of prior period expenses pertaining to expenditure crystallized or details received after completion of earlier years' audits. Genuineness not doubted,...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed various issues: disallowance of provisions for waste disposal expenses due to lack of evidence and scientific basis, upheld disallowance...

ITAT ruled against disallowance of transportation expenses, finding the Assessing Officer failed to establish statutory grounds u/s 37 for rejection. The tribunal...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) decided the following: Disallowance of proportionate interest expenses was unjustified as the assessee had sufficient...

The ITAT held that interest disallowance was not justified as borrowed funds were invested in equity shares, not loans. Disallowance of land acquisition cost was...

The High Court ruled on the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, which was challenged as being ultra vires...

Key legal principles and decisions related to various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The...

The ITAT held that the CIT (A) erred in admitting additional evidence without following Rule 46A. Deletion of additions on forfeited amount and various expenses was...

Disallowance of credit cannot rest upon statements but must stand the test of definition of ‘input service’ in rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 on facts which is...

Customs broker's license revocation order set aside due to lack of evidence for alleged violations. Key findings: no proof of misdeclaration or undervaluation to...

The High Court held that once the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) found no cogent or convincing evidence from the Revenue to allege bogus purchases, it was wrong to...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

The High Court held that petitioners are entitled to pay 10% of the disputed GST amount as a pre-condition for filing an appeal by debiting the amount available in the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowances against Credit card expense and computer expenses - considering the amount involve, the contention of the revenue authority...

Disallowance to 10% of the sub brokerage expenses - the Tribunal not accepting 20% disallowance and limiting the disallowance to 10% in these facts cannot be said to be...

Quick Updates: