Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2023 Year 2023 This

Transitional Credit - Revision of return on MVAT for June 2017 - ...


Court Remands MVAT Case for June 2017 Due to Lack of Justification; Section 25 Powers Within Limitation Period.

April 13, 2023

Case Laws     GST     HC

Transitional Credit - Revision of return on MVAT for June 2017 - the order should be self-speaking. It cannot be that the Authority passes an order without reasons, and then arguments are advanced in a writ jurisdiction at the first instance. Furthermore, the Petitioner before us is not the one who is delaying the payment of taxes. Remand is also necessary to highlight the need to give a reasoned order. The learned Counsel for the parties jointly state that the exercise of power under section 25 of the MVAT Act of 2002 in respect of the order in question would be within the period of limitation. - Matter restored back - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The High Court quashed the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax u/s 74 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, citing violation of...

  2. Seeks to amendment in Notification No. 2/2017-Central Tax, dated the 19th June, 2017 - Notification

  3. The High Court addressed the issue of tax deduction at source for work contracts and supplies, and entitlement to Additional Tax Reimbursement u/s 64A of the Sale of...

  4. The Rajasthan High Court held that the petition challenging an assessment order was not maintainable as the petitioner failed to file an appeal within the prescribed...

  5. Petitioner challenged impugned order regarding GST discrepancies, failing to avail opportunity of personal hearing. Court held that notice was issued by respondent based...

  6. Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of...

  7. The High Court held that the show cause notices issued by the respondent u/s 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, 2017, were flawed due to the improper...

  8. The appellate authority's order passed u/s 107 of the CGST Act, 2017/WBGST Act, 2017 is set aside. The matter is remanded back to the appellate authority with a...

  9. Situation arising out of lockdown ordered as a precaution for prevention of Coronavirus spread - extension of dates of courts to approach the courts of law - All interim...

  10. The High Court addressed the challenge to notifications extending the time limit for issuance of orders u/s 73 of the CGST/AGST Act, 2017, due to the "force majeure"...

  11. The High Court considered a case involving the effect of a retrospective amendment in Section 50 of the CGST Act, 2017 by the Finance Act, 2021. The petition was...

  12. Power of commissioner (appeals) to remand back the case - The order under challenge is not either of the one as is mentioned in sub clause (3) of Section 35A. It is...

  13. The Supreme Court considered the Condonation of Delay in filing an appeal for compensation enhancement, analyzing the applicability of Limitation Act provisions. The...

  14. This case deals with the applicability of Section 153, the limitation provision, to proceedings u/s 144C of the Income Tax Act. The key issues are whether the 11-month...

  15. Petitioner failed to authorize representative for GST matters after registration under GST regime, resulting in show cause notice being served on auditor without...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates