Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Past ...

Penalties Under Customs Act Section 112(b)(ii) Require Proven Link Between Individual and Seized Goods; Past Offenses Not Enough.

April 21, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Past offence can be at best enhancer of civil and/or criminal liabilities, but no penalty can be imposed on any concurrent alleged offence. It is well settled law that no penalty under section 112(b)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962, can be imposed without proving the nexus with the goods under seizure which are liable for confiscation. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(ii) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Past ...

Penalties Under Customs Act Section 112(b)(ii) Require Proven Link Between Individual and Seized Goods; Past Offenses Not Enough.

April 21, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Penalty imposed u/s 112a(ii) of Customs Act for smuggling through mis-declaration and undervaluation. Extent of duty evasion uncertain but forensic evidence established...

The case involved a penalty u/s 112(B) of the Customs Act, 1962 against an employee of a Customs House Agent (CHA) for allegedly concealing information affecting a bill...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Disposal of the seized goods - Non-issuance of SCN - Conclusion of proceedings under Section 110(1D) of the Customs Act, without issuance of SCN - There are no merit in...

Customs officials seized gold jewelry from petitioners on 23-02-2023. Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 mandates issuing show cause notice u/s 124 within six months of...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

The case involved valuation of imported goods, undervaluation, admissibility of appellant's statement u/s 108, documentary evidence, computer printouts u/s 138C,...

The appellants, a customs warehousing station, faced a fire incident resulting in the loss of certain goods. The customs duty amount on the lost goods was paid by the...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

The case involved jurisdiction for show cause notice and Order-in-Original, penalty u/s 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, and confiscation of gold jewelry. The...

Goods were mis-declared in baggage declaration for export, rendering them liable for confiscation. Penalties imposed under Customs Act: Section 114 on individuals...

Seizure of gold of foreign origin, silver granules and Indian currency notes - The High Court overturned the CESTAT's decision, emphasizing that: The statements made by...

Smuggling - Betel Nuts - foreign origin goods - town seizure - notified item or not - onus to prove - The CESTAT recognized that betel nuts were not notified items under...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

Seeking inspection of the goods seized from the premises of the appellant - provisional release of goods - In the present case the goods have only been seized under...

Quick Updates: