Levy of penalty - The original authority did not impose any ...

Case Laws Customs

May 16, 2023

Levy of penalty - The original authority did not impose any penalty whereas learned Commissioner (Appeals) has enhanced penalty to Rs.8,40,467/- and such enhancement of penalty was done without following the procedure laid down in Section 128(3) - reasonable opportunity of showing cause against proposed order of enhancing penalty not provided - The impugned order is not sustainable - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of penalty - The original authority did not impose any ...

Case Laws Customs

May 16, 2023

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 - The discretion of levying penalty is always available with the Statutory Authority under Section 114, whenever such an Authority is of the view...

Levy of penalty u/s 76 - Power of Commissioner (appeals) to impose penalty - It is found that the impugned order has travelled beyond the OIO because in the OIO, the...

Penalty Enhancement - Penalty imposed u/s 112 of the Customs Act, 1962 - The Tribunal ruled that penalty cannot be enhanced in subsequent proceedings without proper...

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Levy of penalty under the wrong provisions of the act - proposes imposition of penalty u/s 114, 114A and 114AA of the Customs Act. Order-in-original has been passed...

No doubt the discretion to levy the penalty or to drop the penalty proceedings is entirely the discretion of the appropriate authority who is authorized under the...

The High Court held that the appellate authority erred in enhancing the tax liability payable by the appellant/assessee in an appeal filed by the assessee without...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

Penalty imposed u/s 270A(9) for underreporting and misreporting of income was challenged due to non-specification of clear charge. The Tribunal held that underreporting...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Adjustment of Penalties from Refund amount - After an appellate order allowed redemption of the seized currency upon payment of fines and penalties, the appellant filed...

Penalty proceedings - Commissioner is not justified in exercising his suo motu powers to interfere with a discretionary order passed by the original authority to impose...

Levy of GST on the penalty levied in the disciplinary proceedings - the penalty imposed, under Rule 7(b) (xiv) of the Code in a disciplinary proceedings initiated...

Quick Updates: