Frivolous additions by the Revenue - the Revenue has failed to ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 23, 2023

Frivolous additions by the Revenue - the Revenue has failed to understand the fundamental difference between sale consideration on one hand and income chargeable to tax on the other. The Revenue despite being assisted by thousands of experts in the field of finance and taxation, has committed such elementary mistake leading to harassment to the assessee who has been compelled to file the present avoidable piece of litigation. More so, this Court has been compelled to decide this frivolous matter wasting its precious time and energy which could have been utilized in more pressing matters. - Cost of Rs. 25000 imposed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Frivolous additions by the Revenue - the Revenue has failed to ...

Case Laws Income Tax

August 23, 2023

You may also like:

Revenue appeal against the pure question of facts - unnecessary litigation on the part of the Revenue Authorities - In the facts and circumstances, no disallowance was...

Addition u/s. 41(1) - Difference between the amount payable as per books of accounts and amount as per the confirmation received from the creditor - The High Court...

Unsecured loans - Additions u/s 69 as unexplained expenditure - the tribunal finds that the ld. CIT(A) rightly deleted the impugned additions as the AO failed to...

Royalty receipts were subject to transfer pricing adjustment by TPO on basis of differences in amounts reflected in Form 3CEB of assessee vis-Ã -vis its group entities,...

Additions towards difference in interest income between interest as per Form 26AS and interest income shown in the Return of Income - Since the alleged accommodation...

Additions based on mismatch in annual information return - If the assessee can reconcile such difference and even otherwise satisfy the learned assessing officer, that...

Addition u/s 68 – Genuineness of transaction in shares - genuine or sham and bogus – Revenue in failing to discharge the basic onus - inquiry was not carried forward -...

Addition on account of difference between commission receipt declared by the assessee and as per Form 26AS - assessee has miserably failed to provide a satisfactory...

Refund of CVD / Excise duty - case is yet to be decided even after 16 years lapsed - We fail to understand that if the claim of the writ applicant could not be looked...

Additions towards the alleged unaccounted sales - The AT noted that the addition had been deleted by the ld. CIT(A), and since there was no appeal from the Revenue, this...

Addition u/s 68 - Share premium - Transaction in the nature of Capital Account - violation of the provision of Section 78(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 - The High court...

Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A)...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

Transfer of property deemed as short-term capital gain due to holding period less than 36 months, disallowing deduction u/s 54F. Additions for difference in commission...

Excess stock found during the course of survey - unexplained investments u/s 69 r.w.s.115BBE - The ITAT concluded that the addition made by the AO was not justified....

Quick Updates: