Additional evidence - rule 46A - Appellate authority should not ...

Appellate Authorities Must Consider New Evidence u/r 46A for Thorough Case Review.

March 28, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Additional evidence - rule 46A - Appellate authority should not refuse to make enquiry in the case where facts and circumstances so demand - CIT(A) directed to consider the additional evidence - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Additional evidence - rule 46A - Appellate authority should not ...

Appellate Authorities Must Consider New Evidence u/r 46A for Thorough Case Review.

March 28, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Clandestine manufacture and recovery of Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty - suppression of facts and misrepresentation alleged against petitioner -...

HC condoned delay in filing appeal by small partnership firm, setting aside appellate authority's rejection. Court found appellate authority erroneously limited...

Validity of the order of the CIT(A) - Non admission of additional evidence - It is indeed the sacrosanct obligation of the first appellate authority to have ensured that...

Validity of initiation of review proceedings - It is a trite law that an order, which is bad from its inception itself, cannot be cured by subsequent action. In the...

Power to review versus Power to rectify - cancellation of GST registration - the appellate authority erroneously exercised its power under Section 161 of the Act. The...

Principles of Natural justice - late filing of return - intent to evade or not - it is the case of petitioner is that various aspects have not been dealt with or...

Rejection of appeal - additional evidence at the appellate stage cane be entertained, at the discretion of the appellate authority, in cases where it can be proved that...

The High Court dismissed a review petition regarding a fraudulent Input Tax Credit (I.T.C.) claim for inward supplies. The petitioner had obtained I.T.C. based on...

Bogus sundry creditors - Whether CIT(A) had clearly violated the provisions of Rule 46A of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, while admitting additional evidence? - The High...

Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

Petitioner availed alternate remedy of filing substantive appeal against assessment order and notices issued u/ss 148A and 148 of the Act. Court held that if assessment...

Petitioner paid IGST but respondent did not take benefit of ITC. Dispute not settled. Appellate authority to consider grievance regarding payment of penalty and interest...

The subordinate authority is not empowered to supersede the orders passed by the appellate authority and an administrative discipline requires that the subordinate...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

The HC held that the review application was partly allowed. There was no mistake apparent on record regarding the application of the Supreme Court decision and the...

Quick Updates: