Assessment u/s 144C(13) in pursuant to the directions of DRP - ...

DRP's Directions u/s 144C(13) Deemed Colorable, Violating Principle Against Indirect Prohibitions in Assessments.

October 27, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Assessment u/s 144C(13) in pursuant to the directions of DRP - In the case in hand, the direction for verification as issued were colourable and the Latin maxim “Quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum”, which means “you cannot do indirectly what you cannot do directly” when applied to aforesaid provisions applicable to DRP prohibits such directions of verification of the whole of the case of an assessee without any element of guidance for the Ld. AO. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessment u/s 144C(13) in pursuant to the directions of DRP - ...

DRP's Directions u/s 144C(13) Deemed Colorable, Violating Principle Against Indirect Prohibitions in Assessments.

October 27, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) subsequent to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)/Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) directions deemed invalid...

TP Adjustment - applicability of Section 144C(13) - As provided in the Section 144C(13) of the Act, the final order of the Assessing Officer should be in conformity with...

HC ruled that time limits under Section 144C(13) for completing assessments following DRP directions are mandatory, not directory. The AO must pass orders within one...

Assessment u/s 144C - It is not in dispute that if no directions are issued, AO need not wait u/s 144C (13). However, the fact remains that once objections are filed...

TP adjustment - AO/TPO has not followed direction of DRP - As per section 144C(13) the AO is bound to pass the final assessment order in conformity with the direction of...

Assessment u/s 144C(13) - Time limit for completion of assessments and reassessments - Sub-section (13) to Section 144C, in my view, imposes a restriction on the...

The HC held that the assessment orders dated 30.08.2022 and 01.09.2022 were issued beyond the permissible limitation period. As per Section 144C(13), the AO must...

DRP directions without a valid computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN) allotted and quoted in the body of the order are invalid and deemed never issued....

Assessment u/s. 144C(13) - time limit for completion of the assessment order u/s. 144C(13) - The relaxation under TOLA would not be applicable to the assessment orders...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) read with section 144B - the assessment order has been passed beyond the time limit prescribed u/s....

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of final assessment orders passed beyond the limit set by section 144C(13). It was held that the Assessing Officer (AO)...

ITAT ruled in favor of assessee on two key issues. First, the allegation of "on-money" payment for residential property was rejected as the difference between actual...

Validity of the final assessment order due to non-implementation of the directions of learned DRP - Royalty/FTS receipts - The ITAT underscored the legal requirement u/s...

Validity of final assessment order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 144C - The view taken by DRP that it has no power to condone the delay is inasmuch as such power is absent...

Powers of the DRP u/s 144C(8) - Tribunal was not right in holding that the DRP exceeded its jurisdiction in passing the order. In any event, the order passed by the DRP...

Quick Updates: