Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was ...

Case Laws Central Excise

November 1, 2023

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS Scheme and there is no cause for imposition of penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the director of the company who has been a paid employee - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was ...

Case Laws Central Excise

November 1, 2023

You may also like:

Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

100% EOU - extended period of limitation - while demanding duty was not sure of the provision of law under which the same had to be demanded and even the penalty has...

Penalty on directors - Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules - Rule 26 is prima facie in excess of the Rule making power conferred under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - HC

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a...

Demand of differential Central Excise Duty with interest and penalty - inflating freight charges through their dummy transport unit - The Tribunal affirmed the...

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Demand of excise duty and penalty – recovery of dues from the auction purchaser unit in terms of Rule 230(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 - recovery proceedings dropped - HC

Valuation - adjustment of excess excise duty paid against the short payment - during the relevant period the Appellant had paid the correct duty arrived at in terms of...

Revocation of registration under Central Excise - Revocation of registration, not provided for in Central Excise Rules, 2002 and only in exercise of power of Central...

Levy of penalty imposed under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - wrongful availment of CENVAT Credit - There are no whisper about any retraction or any disputes...

Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

Price variation clause - applicability of period of limitation on demand of Interest under central excise - AT

Quick Updates: