Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2023 Year 2023 This

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was ...


Director Avoids Penalty After Duty Demand Settlement Under SVLDRS Scheme; No Justification for Rule 26 Penalty Imposition.

November 1, 2023

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS Scheme and there is no cause for imposition of penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 on the director of the company who has been a paid employee - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Once the main demand of duty case is settled under the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDRS) 2019, penalties imposed on co-noticees cannot be...

  2. Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - refusal to issue the Discharge Certificate - The Scheme being a piece of reformative legislation,...

  3. Clandestine removal of goods denied CENVAT credit. Liability for duty, interest, and penalty from FY 2007-08 to 2011-12 assessed. Differential duty demand of Rs....

  4. Demand of duty and Levy of penalty - Levy of penalty on Director - Clandestine removal - The demand was based on data printouts retrieved from a third party's computer,...

  5. Clandestine removal demand based on electricity consumption not sustainable as mere electricity consumption cannot be the sole basis for determining duty liability....

  6. Power of settlement commission - Settlement Commission is within its powers to impose penalty on each of the Directors in addition to the imposition of penalty upon the...

  7. CIRP - Successful resolution applicant - Demand of service tax - scheme Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 - As the appellant was not in a position...

  8. Maintainability of appeal - requirement of mandatory pre-deposit - appellate has deposited entire amount of duty (100% of duty) instead of 7.5% / 10% - Only demand of...

  9. Duplication of demand by issuing two show cause notices (SCN) for the same period - Sabka Vishwas Legacy Disputes Resolution Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS) - The Dispute...

  10. The appellants made the payment on 25.08.2020 under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDRS). The dispute was whether this payment would...

  11. Substitution of estimated amount payable as mentioned in forms SVLDRS-2 and SVLDRS-3 with the tax dues less tax relief amounts - Having regard to the objective of the...

  12. Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market - Settlement Regulations - SEBI should reconsider and seriously give a thought in coming out with a...

  13. Petitioner paid Rs. 8,46,84,821/- under Settlement Scheme for 2010-2011, against which Respondents recovered Rs. 19,16,74,501/-, resulting in excess collection of Rs....

  14. The recent Public Notice No. 04/2024, in line with Notification No.32/2023-Customs and Circular No. 11/2023-Customs, introduces an Amnesty Scheme for a one-time...

  15. Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution)Scheme (SVLDRS), 2019 comes into force w.e.f. 1.9.2019

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates