Revision u/s 263 - The use of the word `and’ between the two ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 22, 2023

Revision u/s 263 - The use of the word `and’ between the two expressions amply demonstrates that the calling for and examining the record by the CIT should precede and his such examination should culminate in getting satisfied that the order passed by the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The use of the word `and’ between the two ...

Case Laws Income Tax

November 22, 2023

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

Revision u/s 263 - providing accommodation entries - Section 263 requires the CIT to consider the order erroneous after examining the records of the proceedings. Here in...

Revision u/s 263 - Invocation of revision proceedings for the second time - As pertinent to point out that there was no bar on limitation by the ld. PCIT to invoke...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - Since the aforesaid exercise was carried out by the second AO in the reassessment...

Revision u/s 263 - The words “as he deems necessary”, in our view, do not mean that the Ld. PCIT was left with a choice either to make or not to make an enquiry. As per...

Revision u/s 263 - Applicability of provisions of 56(2)(vii)(b) - Documentary evidence available in the records which the AO admits to have verified the veracity thereof...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - When the case of the assessee was selected under CASS to examine the capital gains then the AO was required to examine the case meticulously on...

The Rajasthan High Court examined the validity of revision proceedings u/s 263 concerning the period of limitation. The issue was whether the period of limitation for...

Revision u/s 263 - The word ‘may’ used in Section 263 should be presumed to be shall or otherwise interpreting the word “may” as not mandatory, orders can be passed even...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Revision u/s 263 - debatable issue - taxability of interest received by the Assessee on the enhanced compensation u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act - The Appellate...

Revision u/s 263 - the ld PCIT had invoked revision jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act on the very same point of allowability of LTCL. Hence it could be safely concluded...

Revision u/s 263 - It is evident that A.O. made enquiries on the issue and assessee complied to the enquiries and filed all the required details. Thus, it is not a case...

Revision u/s 263 - CIT setting aside the second reassessment order - time limit to take action u/s 263 - the necessity for the Commissioner to have substantial grounds...

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2(d) under section 263 specifically states that revision is possible only due to judgments of the jurisdictional High Court or supreme...

Quick Updates: