Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of the provisions of Section ...

Penalty for Prior Year Deemed Unsound; Section 271E Penalty Imposition Overturned Due to Lack of Pending Proceedings.

December 8, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of the provisions of Section 269T in the preceding assessment year - no proceedings pending before the Ld. AO qua the assessee for A.Y. 2014-15 - initiation of penalty proceedings under section 271E of the Act on the basis of assessment order for A.Y. 2015-16 is bad in law and imposition of impugned penalty by Ld. JCIT and confirmation thereof by the Ld. CIT(A) is not sustainable. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271E - contravention of the provisions of Section ...

Penalty for Prior Year Deemed Unsound; Section 271E Penalty Imposition Overturned Due to Lack of Pending Proceedings.

December 8, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

The case before CESTAT New Delhi involved fraudulent registration and utilization of duty-free scrips, leading to penalties. The appellant failed to comply with...

Deemed dividend u/s. 2(22)(e) - the loan given by the company only in the immediate preceding year, i.e., assessment year 2007-08, should be assessed as deemed dividend...

The Income Tax Act did not intend to tax deemed rental income from properties held as stock-in-trade prior to the assessment year 2018-19. Section 23(5), introduced from...

Claim of expenditure pertaining to earlier year - prior period expenses - If there was no accrual of the expenditure in the earlier year or had not become due. It became...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

The ITAT held that the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 were beyond the 10-year limitation period u/s 153C read with Explanation-1 to section 153A. Hence,...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for under reporting income - defective notice - The Tribunal agrees with the appellant's argument, emphasizing that the AO did not apply his mind...

The High Court considered the legality of a penalty imposed u/s 31(3) of the Bihar Finance Act, 1981, due to the want of Form 28B. The issue was whether the defendants...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged due to lack of material relating to alleged wrongful IGST refunds for assessment year 2020-21. Disallowable expenditure...

The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill violation, classifying goods as ODC due to speed without intent to evade tax. Relying on precedent, mens rea is essential...

The ITAT ruled against penalty imposition u/s 271AA for failure to maintain transfer pricing documentation u/s 92D read with Rule 10D. The tribunal emphasized that...

Failure to comply with Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements in an export transaction involving banned goods (Red Sanders) resulted in the imposition of penalties u/s...

Quick Updates: