Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2025 Year 2025 This

The ITAT ruled against penalty imposition u/s 271AA for failure ...


ITAT Cancels Transfer Pricing Penalty u/s 271AA Due To Lack Of Specific Documentation Deficiencies.

January 23, 2025

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

The ITAT ruled against penalty imposition u/s 271AA for failure to maintain transfer pricing documentation u/s 92D read with Rule 10D. The tribunal emphasized that before levying penalties, tax authorities must specifically identify which required documents were not maintained or furnished by the assessee. The AO's penalty order was deemed procedurally deficient due to lack of proper show-cause notice and inadequate hearing opportunity. Moreover, since the Transfer Pricing Officer had already determined the international transactions with Associated Enterprises to be at arm's length, there was no substantive basis for penalty. The perfunctory nature of the assessment and failure to specify particular documentation deficiencies rendered the penalty order legally unsustainable.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that in determining the arm's length price for transfer pricing adjustments, three companies (MOIAPL, LCAPL, and MOEPAPL)...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various transfer pricing issues concerning an assessee. Regarding segmentation of business activities, the ITAT...

  3. Transfer pricing officer (TPO) erred by considering non-associated enterprise (non-AE) revenue and costs while computing transfer pricing (TP) adjustment, contrary to...

  4. The case pertains to the levy of penalty u/s 271G for failure to furnish documents and information u/ss 92CA/92D. The key points are: The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO)...

  5. The High Court upheld the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had approved the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method adopted by the assessee for...

  6. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer/Transfer Pricing Officer for fresh adjudication....

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  8. The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the issue of penalty u/s 271G in a case involving Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustment. The assessee did not initially provide...

  9. Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

  10. The Tribunal meticulously analyzed each issue, heavily relying on precedent ITAT decisions and the specifics of the case presented. For the major contentious points,...

  11. Appellate jurisdiction of ITAT - ITAT Kolkata or ITAT Indore - approaching the wrong appellate jurisdiction - President, ITAT, has no power to transfer appeal/s between...

  12. Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments - Transfer Pricing (TP) adjustments - debar of deduction u/s 10A on addition income assessed u/s 92CD as per the Proviso to 92C(4) -...

  13. Assessee failed to justify receipt discrepancy between ITR and Form 26AS, AO made addition considering it as fees for technical services and imposed penalty u/s 270A for...

  14. Condonation of delay - Delay in filling of an appeal before ITAT - The ITAT observed taht the appeal was delayed by 17 days. The assessee claimed the delay was due to...

  15. This is a summary of an Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order dealing with various transfer pricing and deduction issues. The key points are: Transfer pricing...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates