Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights December 2023 Year 2023 This

Penalty u/s 271D - assessee has accepted cash as part of sale ...


Penalty for Cash Sale Invalidated Due to Lack of AO's Satisfaction in Assessment Order Under Income Tax Act.

December 9, 2023

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty u/s 271D - assessee has accepted cash as part of sale consideration on sale of immovable property - the Ld.AO has not recorded the satisfaction regarding the initiation of penalty proceedings while passing the assessment order u/s. 143(3) of the Act which is a prerequisite for initiation of penalty u/s. 271D of the Act. We are of the considered opinion that issuing a notice u/s. 274 r.w.s 271D of the Act is nothing but an afterthought of the Ld. AO. - No penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 271D for contravention of Section 269SS, which restricts cash transactions above a specified sum for immovable property. The key points are: The...

  2. Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

  3. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding that the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act by the Assessing Officer was vitiated due to a lack of...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  5. Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

  6. HC ruled penalty proceedings under sections 271D and 271E require explicit satisfaction to be recorded by Assessing Officer during reassessment. Mere recording of...

  7. Transfer of property deemed as short-term capital gain due to holding period less than 36 months, disallowing deduction u/s 54F. Additions for difference in commission...

  8. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  9. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - exemption u/s 80-IC - income in the garb of fictitious cash sales - Assessing Officer as well as the Appellate Authority, rightly gave...

  10. The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

  11. Sections 132B, 140A, 153A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were analyzed regarding adjustment of seized cash against tax liability. The appellants claimed that cash...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal held that for penalty u/s 270A, there must be satisfaction by the AO about concealment of income or inaccurate particulars. Citing Golden Peace...

  13. Recovery of sales tax dues - encumbered property or not - liability of auction purchasers - this is a clear case in which the Sales Tax Department had a charge on the...

  14. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  15. The High Court confirmed the tax assessment u/s 7A for nonproduction of sale bill. The burden of proof lies on the dealer to show transactions are not taxable. Failure...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates