Revision u/s 263 - PCIT partially looking into the assessment ...

PCIT's Section 263 Revision Overruled: No Error or Revenue Prejudice Found in Assessee's Expense Evidence.

January 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT partially looking into the assessment records and initiated the Revision proceedings on the ground that the assessee failed to submit evidences in support of the expenses, which is factually incorrect. Unless both the ingredients i.e order must be erroneous in nature; and the error must be such that it is prejudicial to the interest of Revenue are present in a given case, it is not legally permissible for a Commissioner to initiate suo motu proceeding u/s 263 - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - PCIT partially looking into the assessment ...

PCIT's Section 263 Revision Overruled: No Error or Revenue Prejudice Found in Assessee's Expense Evidence.

January 3, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Addition under the head of Vehicle Running Expenses and Repairs & Maintenance - "exaggerated expense' or "not reasonable expense". - The onus is on the Revenue to...

Assessment u/s 153C - disallowance made u/s 37. Assessing Officer observed no supporting evidence for claimed expenses furnished by assessee and non-cooperation during...

Revision u/s 263 - The tribunal held that, when the ld. PCIT himself was satisfied that there was no error in the order of the Assessing Officer vis-à-vis irregularities...

Additions u/s 69C - purview and scope of section 69C is totally different from the disallowance of expenses found to be not genuine - The basic premise with the CIT...

Addition made u/s 69C of the Income Tax Act for alleged cash payments based on a WhatsApp message and statement of a third party. The key points are: The WhatsApp...

Penalties levied u/ss 271D and 271E were challenged. The assessee was found to have violated Sections 269SS and 269T. However, there was no concrete finding that the...

Revision u/s 263 - The ITAT held that the AO had conducted adequate inquiries into the sales promotion expenses, as evidenced by the issuance of specific queries to the...

Denial of claim of loss or to categorize certain expenses as pre-operative expenses - commencement of business during the year - assessee’s business was ‘set up’ or not...

Exemption granted on Invalid F-Form – Invocation of revision jurisdiction – KGST - If there was error resulting in revenue losing tax, it would be prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 - The fact that the vouchers were not found in the premises of the appellant trust at the time of survey proceedings, should have triggered the AO to...

Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

Addition on account of revenue recognition following percentage of completion method (POCM) - as per AO assessee had incurred substantial expenses on construction but...

Legality of revision of order of Tribunal u/s 254 on ground of retrospective overruling - Judicial decision acts retrospectively. Judges do not make law they only...

Onus on assessee to explain exorbitant increase in transport expenses and support with proper bills/vouchers, which assessee failed. Sample bills/vouchers not for...

Nature of expenses - Relaunch expenses - deferred revenue expenditure claimed to the extent of 1/3rd in each of the year -The tribunal disagreed with the AO's...

Quick Updates: