Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

January 6, 2024

Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was listed for hearing on 12.05.2023 and he entered appearance through Counsel, who inspite of entering his attendance in chat box, is not shown to be present. The relevant fact to be noticed is that the Appellant was well aware of the date 12.05.2023. - The Adjudicating Authority did not commit any error in rejecting IA No.3216 of 2023. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Recall of an order - The Appellant was well aware that case was ...

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy

January 6, 2024

You may also like:

This public notice from the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) further extends the abeyance of Public Notice No. 05/2024 dated 27.05.2024 regarding modification...

Violation of principles of natural justice due to absence of appellant's counsel during proceedings. High Court noted counsel's absence on certain dates, but matter...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Order directing reversal of actions taken after the insolvency commencement date (ICD) of 22.02.2023 until 01.06.2023. Respondents opposed interim relief, arguing...

Import of certain IT hardware is restricted. Importers can apply for import authorizations valid until 31.12.2024. Existing authorizations issued until 30.09.2024 remain...

Seeking release of goods - goods imported freely or not - Second hand Multifunction Print and copying machines - In the Notification No.5/2015-2020, dated 07.05.2019,...

This public notice extends the abeyance of Public Notice No. 05/2024 dated 27.05.2024, which modified wastage permissible and Standard Input Output Norms for...

The Policy Circular No. 03/2024 issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade clarifies Para 4.17 of the Hand Book of Procedures-2023. It allows applicants to file...

The Public Notice extends the abeyance of Public Notice No. 05/2024 dated 27.05.2024, which modified wastage permissible and Standard Input Output Norms for...

The petitioners failed to reflect the remittance of Goods and Services Tax (GST) in their GSTR returns due to technical reasons, and there was a lack of clear proof of...

Seeking recall of order - It is the appellant who had filed the early hearing application and, therefore, it was the duty of the applicant to follow the dates on which...

Jurisdiction of the Bench to Hear the application of Rectification of Mistake - recall of the entire order - an application for rectification of a mistake u/s129B (2) of...

Provisional attachment order u/s 83 of CGST Act challenged for completion of one year's period. Court held that Section 83 employs mandatory language, and impugned...

Validity of order if Initiation of CIRP - After the final hearing of the matter, ITAT reserved the order for passing - Thereafter, appellant prayed for recall the...

The audit wing of the State GST Authority directed to keep in abeyance all proceedings related to discrepancy note no. 3, including the show cause notice dated...

Quick Updates: