Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

Scope and ambit of Section 29A (c) of IBC - Disqualification to ...


De Facto Control Under MoU Leads to Ineligibility for Resolution Plan Due to Section 29A(c) of IBC.

February 20, 2024

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     AT

Scope and ambit of Section 29A (c) of IBC - Disqualification to submit the Resolution Plan u/s 29A - The Tribunal observed that, Section 29A, sub-section (c) does, not only disqualify, those who were in management and control of the Corporate Debtor at the time when its account was declared NPA, but also disqualifies those, who were in management and control of the Corporate Debtor and in close proximity of time, before submission of Resolution Plan, who failed to clear the debts of the Corporate Debtor. - The NCLAT analyzed the MoU and subsequent actions by the appellant, concluding that the appellant had de facto control over the corporate debtor, including the right to nominate directors and make significant management decisions. This control started from the date of the MoU, making the appellant ineligible under Section 29A.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal examined the applicability of Section 240A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to the Corporate Debtor registered as an MSME and whether...

  2. Implementation of the Resolution Plan and change in management and control - Demand of customs duty - The appellant did not file any claim during the insolvency process,...

  3. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  4. Rejection of Application for Pre-Packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP) based on Ineligibility or Deficiency in Application - The NCLAT found the application was...

  5. This case deals with the extinguishment of demands due to the non-filing of claims by the revenue during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) under the...

  6. The resolution plan approved by the NCLT on 20th March, 2023, extinguished all claims, including statutory dues owed to the Central Government, that were not...

  7. Validity of Assessment Order u/s 143(3) once the Resolution Plan is approved under the Code - CIRP proceedings under IBC - The resolution plan approved by the NCLT is...

  8. Demand of KGST when the resolution plan was approved - Jurisdiction and applicability of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) over statutory dues. The court...

  9. Approval of Resolution Plan - The Tribunal found the resolution plan’s treatment of operational creditors contrary to Section 30(2)(b) of the IBC, as operational...

  10. No reduction in approval of resolution plans after enactment of IBC (Amendment) Ordinance 2017

  11. The jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Tribunal to interfere with the Resolution Plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) is limited...

  12. The High Court held that the Execution Application filed by the Applicant against the Respondent does not survive due to the approved Resolution Plan under the...

  13. The Supreme Court held that the Effective Date for implementing the Resolution Plan was achieved on 20.05.2022 as all Conditions Precedent were fulfilled. The...

  14. Withdrawal of Resolution Plan - resolution plan was approved by Committee of Creditors - the existing insolvency framework in India provides no scope for effecting...

  15. Withdrawal/modification of approved Resolution Plan - Section 31(1) of IBC - The Supreme Court addressed cross-appeals concerning the approval of a resolution plan under...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates