Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG on shares - onus to prove - - ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

February 20, 2024

Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG on shares - onus to prove - - Despite opportunities provided, the assessee company failed to adequately explain the nature and source of the funds received from the share subscriber companies. This failure to discharge the burden of proof led the A.O. to conclude that the transactions were suspicious. - The assessee company argued that it merely acted as a facilitator for transferring funds to the real beneficiary. However, this contention was not accepted by the ITAT as there was insufficient evidence to prove that the funds were indeed transferred for legitimate purposes. Argument of double taxation also not find favor of the tribunal - Additions confirmed by the tribunal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were added due to assessee's failure to discharge onus regarding bogus share capital including premium receipts. Despite filing...

  2. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  3. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital receipts - Onus to prove -Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share capital receipts - Onus to prove - SC dismissed the SLP against...

  4. Assessment u/s 153A - beneficiary of bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove - The whole basis of making additions is third-party statement and no opportunity of...

  5. Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove genuineness of the transactions - The whole basis of making additions is third-party statement and no opportunity of...

  6. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  7. Bogus LTCG on shares - Addition u/s 68 - Transactions in Shares - For making an addition holding that transaction are bogus, the LD AO should have made inquiries on the...

  8. Bogus LTCG - addition u/s 68 - the assessee is a habitual investor having portfolio of investment in shares in crores and is still holding investment in shares in...

  9. Addition u/s 68 - onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the share applicants - Both the nature & source of the share application received was...

  10. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash credits - Onus to prove - CIT(A) deleted addition - The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to discharge its onus of proving the...

  11. Addition made u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - unexplained cash credits - suspicious transactions in shares - penny stock - The Tribunal ultimately upheld the AO's decision to...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - share capital issued at the premium - unexplained cash credit - Assessee has fully discharged its onus cast under section 68 of the Act and proved the...

  13. In this case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) examined the additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) regarding long-term capital gains (LTCG) from share...

  14. Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share premium and share capital - the assessee has substantially provided materials to prove the genuineness of the share holders apart...

  15. Addition u/s 68 – Genuineness of transaction in shares - genuine or sham and bogus – Revenue in failing to discharge the basic onus - inquiry was not carried forward -...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates