Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG on shares - onus to prove - - ...


Tribunal Upholds Suspicious Fund Transactions as Bogus LTCG u/s 68; Rejects Assessee's Double Taxation Claim.

February 20, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG on shares - onus to prove - - Despite opportunities provided, the assessee company failed to adequately explain the nature and source of the funds received from the share subscriber companies. This failure to discharge the burden of proof led the A.O. to conclude that the transactions were suspicious. - The assessee company argued that it merely acted as a facilitator for transferring funds to the real beneficiary. However, this contention was not accepted by the ITAT as there was insufficient evidence to prove that the funds were indeed transferred for legitimate purposes. Argument of double taxation also not find favor of the tribunal - Additions confirmed by the tribunal.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Addition made u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - unexplained cash credits - suspicious transactions in shares - penny stock - The Tribunal ultimately upheld the AO's decision to...

  2. Bogus LTCG on shares - Addition u/s 68 - Transactions in Shares - For making an addition holding that transaction are bogus, the LD AO should have made inquiries on the...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of addition u/s 68 for alleged bogus LTCG from sale of shares. The Tribunal noted that the transactions were conducted on a...

  4. The Assessee, a regular investor in shares, made investments and sold a particular script when prices were high, resulting in Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG). The...

  5. The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 and addition u/s 68. The AO had sufficient material to believe the assessee...

  6. Bogus LTCG - Addition u/s 68 - bogus penny stock transaction - suspicion v/s facts - disallowing the exemption u/s 10(38) - The assessee has demonstrated with...

  7. Addition of bogus sales - difference in opinion between learned Members constituting the bench - The appellate tribunal (Third Member) addressed the dispute arising from...

  8. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition u/s 68 as the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of LTCG claimed u/s 10(38). The AO found discrepancies in off-market...

  9. Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

  10. Bogus LTCG - exemption u/s 10(38) denied - The AO contended that the LTCG was undisclosed income arising from alleged manipulation in penny stocks. However, the assessee...

  11. Addition u/s 68 - Bogus LTCG - Penny stock transactions - The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient documentary evidence supporting the genuineness of...

  12. Addition u/s 68 - bogus LTCG - penny stock transaction - The ITAT observed that even though characteristics of penny stock transactions were present, there was no direct...

  13. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

  14. Bogus commodity loss transaction identified as mere accommodation entry facilitated through complex fund routing. Revenue's investigation revealed modus operandi of...

  15. ITAT dismissed tax authority's appeal regarding additions under sections 68 and 69C. Primary dispute concerned alleged bogus long-term capital gains (LTCG) from penny...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates