Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Seeking amendment in the bills of entry - Refund of customs duty ...


Importer Seeks Refund for Misclassified Fitbit Devices; Tribunal Orders Quick Decision on Amendment Application.

March 11, 2024

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Seeking amendment in the bills of entry - Refund of customs duty wrongly paid - The appellant imported Fitbit Wearable Devices and sought a refund after realizing incorrect classification. The Commissioner (Appeals) allowed the refund for three entries but rejected it for eight, citing non-reassessment and pending amendment applications. The Tribunal directed the Deputy Commissioner to expedite the decision on the pending amendment application.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

  2. Gross violation of CBEC instructions and the precedential value of CESTAT decisions. The Revenue filed an appeal before the first Appellate Authority without specifying...

  3. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of short-term loss claimed by the assessee in the Profit and Loss Account, holding that the shares were acquired under a normal...

  4. The appellant sought refund of Countervailing Duty (CVD) and Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid in cash u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 142(3)...

  5. The case concerns the time limit for filing a refund claim of Special Additional Duty (SAD) paid by an importer. The issue is whether the one-year limitation specified...

  6. The appellants claimed that the entire amount of service tax paid by them should be considered as a deposit u/s 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and sought a refund....

  7. Validity of notification for restricting the import of certain beans, peas and pulses - different interim orders were passed by the different High Courts and the...

  8. Refund claim for the amount of CVD paid - time limitation - Duty was paid under protest or not - The appellant, an importer of silk yarn and silk fabrics, filed a refund...

  9. Refund - demand was raised on products which was claimed as exempted by the assessee - assessee paid the demand through cenvat credit - after getting favorable order,...

  10. Power to issue SCN - Recovery of erroneous refund with interest - It is more than apparent that section 11A of the Excise Act cannot be resorted to by the Department for...

  11. ITAT held that interest on refund is payable till the date funds are released to assessee, not till date of order accepting refund claim. Relying on Delhi HC's Nokia...

  12. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) allowed the appeals by remanding the matter back to the original authority. The Tribunal held that the...

  13. Refund of Service Tax - time limitation - Exercise of power u/s 142(3) of GST Act for refund of service tax - The case involves the rejection of a refund claim by the...

  14. Refund claim filed by CHA on behalf of importer - Regulation 2 of Customs Refund Application (Form) Regulations, 1995 provides for CHA to file refund claim on behalf of...

  15. The High Court held that the revisional authority's order placing the refund sanction order in abeyance u/s 108 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates