Levy of Penalty u/s 73 - non willful mis-statement - ...

Court Remands Case for Reconsideration of Tax Return Discrepancies; Petitioner to Present Evidence.

March 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

Levy of Penalty u/s 73 - non willful mis-statement - discrepancies found on the returns - Validity of notice uploaded in the common portal and not communicated physically - The High court acknowledged the petitioner's assertion that they possess the necessary documents to refute the alleged discrepancies and are willing to submit them. - The court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the impugned order. The matter was remanded back to the respondent for fresh consideration. The petitioner was directed to appear before the respondent with the required documents on a specified date, and the respondent was instructed to reconsider the issue promptly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty u/s 73 - non willful mis-statement - ...

Court Remands Case for Reconsideration of Tax Return Discrepancies; Petitioner to Present Evidence.

March 13, 2024

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

In a High Court case, the petitioner challenged an order due to inability to respond to show cause notice or participate in proceedings because of cancer diagnosis....

The Madras High Court found a violation of natural justice as notices were only uploaded on the GST portal without direct communication to the petitioner. The tax...

Failure to deposit tax before furnishing returns or alongwith the returns - imposition of penalties confirmed - revisionist held that there was reason - matter remanded...

Acquittal of charge u/s 276CC - respondent has failed to comply with the provisions contained u/s 139(1) and he has submitted the income tax returns after a delay of 28...

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner was not given a fair chance to contest a tax demand due to a mismatch between GSTR 3B return and...

Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity...

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

The High Court address the rejection of revision petition u/s 264 due to an inadvertent error in filing Form ITR-VII, resulting in denial of exemption to a trust...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the petitioner not having a fair opportunity to contest a tax demand. The...

Carry forward of excess payment of tax as ITC for next year - Allegation of availment of excess input tax credit - . The appellant argued that the net tax payable for...

The High Court found a violation of natural justice as the petitioner's reply to the show cause notice was not considered. Discrepancies in GSTR returns were explained...

The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural...

Reversal of ITC - wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on Car - The petitioner contended that despite reversing the ITC in the GSTR 3B return, the impugned order...

Non-service of show cause notice violated principles of natural justice. Respondent imposed tax liability without providing opportunity and documents to petitioner for...

Liability of tax arising on account of inadvertent error - mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 1 and GSTR 3B returns The High Court noted the certificates from...

Quick Updates: