Clandestine removal - it is alleged that respondents have shown ...

Case Laws Central Excise

March 20, 2024

Clandestine removal - it is alleged that respondents have shown excess manufacture in order to avail excess refund to the tune of Rs. 60 lakhs - burden of proof lies with the prosecution or not - The Tribunal acknowledges the serious nature of the charge but finds that the Revenue failed to establish tangible evidence beyond a single test run. They emphasize the necessity of thorough investigation and tangible evidence to prove such allegations conclusively. - The Tribunal notes the various factors affecting fuel consumption and production, concluding that a single test run cannot accurately represent overall production.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - it is alleged that respondents have shown ...

Case Laws Central Excise

March 20, 2024

You may also like:

Clandestine removal - CENVAT credit Demand - Penalty - shortage of goods - Mere signing of the chart alleging removal of finished goods cannot be treated as clear...

100% EOU - Clandestine removal - case of the department is on the ground that deemed export clearance were not genuine and were shown only on paper - The entire case of...

Clandestine removal of goods - excess generation of waste on manufacture of bottles - charges of clandestine removal cannot be upheld on the basis of assumptions and...

Evasion of duty - Clandestine removal of goods - charges of clandestine removal cannot be made on the basis of alleged consumption of one of the raw materials - AT

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Clandestine removal - suppression of production - Merely deposit of money at the time of investigation would not amount to acceptance of allegations of clandestine...

Refund of SAD - denial of refund on the ground that the test of unjust enrichment not passed on - non-collection of excess duty paid by the appellant - The certificate...

Clandestine manufacture and removal - shortage of finished goods or not - There was no clandestine removal of goods against the seized Gate Passes, which are also not...

Clandestine removal - excess usage of raw material Sponge Iron, than mentioned - the entire demand is based on mere average yield of production and no concrete evidence...

Clandestine removal - Ingots - demands of duty made on account of alleged production based on the number of heats and alleged clandestine removal based on parallel...

Clandestine removal - penalty - The unquestioned documentary evidence would suffice to establish the clandestine removal and the handling of such goods by M/s Royal...

Clandestine removal - penalty has rightly been imposed on the appellants for their collaborative role in the conspiracy of clandestine removal of goods by M/s HSAL and...

The approach of the department is absurd - in absence of any evidence showing clandestine removal it cannot be alleged that there was unexplained shortage of Cenvat...

100% EOU - Clandestine removal - illicit clearance of imported yarn and indigenous Yarn - detection of shortages at the time of the visit of the officers - The Appellant...

Clandestine production and removal - excesses and shortages in stock - The quantum of excess and shortages determined by the exercise of stock taking is negligible in...

Quick Updates: