Validity of order of ITAT allowing Applications filed u/s 254(2) ...

Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal, Highlights Inconsistencies in ITAT Order on Rectification vs. Review Applications.

March 21, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Validity of order of ITAT allowing Applications filed u/s 254(2) - Rectification versus Review of order - TP Adjustment - The High court observed that the ITAT had rendered incompatible and inconsistent findings in its original order. - The court noted a contradiction between paragraphs 12 and 21 of the original order. - It was deemed necessary for the ITAT to recall its previous order and correct the error to avoid leaving the TPO and Assessing Officer in a quandary. - The court found that the issue of comparability regarding one company was left open for the ITAT's consideration, while another company's matter was remitted to the TPO. - Ultimately, the court determined that the appeal of Revenue did not raise any substantial question of law and dismissed it accordingly.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Validity of order of ITAT allowing Applications filed u/s 254(2) ...

Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal, Highlights Inconsistencies in ITAT Order on Rectification vs. Review Applications.

March 21, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

Rectification of mistake - ITAT has allows appeal on merit & dismissed the assessee’s cross objections as infructuous regarding re-opening of assessment. Assesse not...

Doctrine of Merger of High Court Decision with the Order of Supreme Court - The Jharkhand High Court, in its analysis, delved into the doctrine of merger, a pivotal...

Power to review versus Power to rectify - cancellation of GST registration - the appellate authority erroneously exercised its power under Section 161 of the Act. The...

Seeking review - error apparent on the face of record or not - The High Court held that, these documents were not part of the pleadings. Review does not mean rehearing...

The case involves a review petition filed in the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking to recall an order that dismissed an appeal due to the absence of substantial...

Rectification u/s 154 - refund of taxes paid in foreign country - The High court noted that the Hon'ble Apex Court had expressly overruled the AAR order in a previous...

HC dismissed the review petition against its order that had remitted the case for fresh assessment. The court found no grounds for review as the original order was based...

The review petition filed u/s 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any mistake or...

The High Court set aside the impugned order dated 02.02.2024 rejecting the Rectification Application filed by the petitioner. The court found that the order lacked...

Review petition - Validity of reopening of assessment - The High Court dismissed the review petitions seeking to challenge a common order dated 04.11.2022, which set...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Review petition dismissed for lack of grounds permissible under law. Court found no mistake or error apparent on record to warrant review of the impugned order passed...

Quick Updates: