Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The tribunal sided ...


Tribunal Invalidates Re-assessment Notice Lacking Required Sanction; Time Extension Ordinance Inapplicable.

March 22, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The tribunal sided with the assessee on the key issue of the legality of the re-assessment notice under section 148. It was held that the notice was invalid as it was issued without the required sanction from the competent authority as prescribed under section 151(1) of the Act after the expiry of four years from the end of the relevant assessment year. - The ITAT observed that the argument that the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation of Certain Provisions) Ordinance, 2020 (TOLA) extended the time limit for issuing the notice was not applicable in this case.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

  2. The Tribunal held that the first appellate authority erred in affirming the re-assessment and levy of anti-dumping duty (ADD) u/s 9A of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975,...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a re-assessment notice issued by the jurisdictional AO instead of the designated Faceless Assessing Officer (FAO) as...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment u/s 147 beyond the limitation period, involving the addition of cash deposits in the assessee's savings bank...

  5. The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of assessment proceedings under Sec 153A where the approval process under Sec 153D was not followed by the Assessing...

  6. Jurisdiction - seizure of goods - extension of time u/s 110(2) for issuing Show Cause Notice (SCN) - no notice for personal hearing has been issued before extension of...

  7. The High Court examined the validity of reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, considering the sanction requirement u/s 151 and the impact of the...

  8. Validity of Assessment order as time barred - delay dispatching assessment order - The Tribunal, after considering the submissions and relevant precedents, concluded...

  9. The ITAT held that the assessment order under section 143(3) was invalid due to jurisdictional defects. The initial notice under section 143(2) was issued by ITO,...

  10. This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

  11. Lack of jurisdiction of AO in issuing notice u/s.143 (2) - Change of residential address of the assessee - The Appellate Tribunal admitted the additional ground raised...

  12. The High Court ruled that the Joint Assistant Commissioner (JAO) lacked jurisdiction to issue notices u/s 148 for reassessment of income escaping assessment. The notices...

  13. Notice issued by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) instead of Faceless Assessment Officer (FAO) u/s 148A(b) for income escaping assessment is invalid. Faceless...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - second re-assessment notice u/s 148A - The High Court noted that the petitioner did not challenge the earlier re-assessment order dated...

  15. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid due to lack of valid sanction as required u/s 151. The competent authority must independently apply its mind based on...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates