Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal concluded that the assessing ...

Income Tax

March 28, 2024

Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal concluded that the assessing officer had conducted a reasonable inquiry into the relevant issues, and the assessment order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. Despite the discrepancy between the intended scrutiny and the actual assessment, the Tribunal upheld the validity of the assessment order. Additionally, the Tribunal rejected the application of Instruction No. 9/2007, stating its inapplicability to the case at hand. - In light of the findings, the High Court dismissed the appeal, as it found no question of law arising from the impugned order.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - The Tribunal concluded that the assessing ...

Income Tax

March 28, 2024

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - CIT has merely directed the Assessing Officer to make an elaborate inquiry. - revision is not valid - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Explanation 2 to section 263 (Deeming erroneous order) is applicable only when there is no enquiry made by the Assessing Officer.

Revision u/s 263 - assessment order passed u/s 153A r.w.s 143(3) - no any incriminating material unearthed by search team therefore Assessing Officer’s order is not erroneous.

Revision u/sec. 263 - CIT has exceeded his jurisdiction in directing the Assessing Officer to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - unaccounted interest payments - the Commissioner of Income Tax cannot find fault and he cannot impose his view on the Assessing Officer - AT

Revision u/s 263 - entire materials on record were not considered by the Assessing Officer - It would have definitely be an erroneous procedure adopted by the AO - HC

Revision u/s 263 - any loss of revenue as a consequence of an order passed by the Assessing Officer cannot be treated as prejudicial to the interests of revenue - AT

Revision u/s 263 - Validity of proceedings – CIT has no jurisdiction to direct the Assessing Officer to initiate proceedings u/s 201(1A) - AT

Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The Appellate Tribunal found that the PCIT's assumption of jurisdiction under Section 263 was not justified. It observed that the assessment...

Quick Updates: