Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellate Tribunal ...

Case Laws Companies Law

March 29, 2024

Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellate Tribunal highlighted the absence of reasoning in the impugned order, especially regarding the direction for an independent forensic audit. It emphasized the necessity of recording reasons to support judicial orders, citing legal precedents. Despite oral submissions, the Appellant failed to file a reply affidavit or supporting documents, leaving the interim order based solely on the petitioner's averments. The Tribunal upheld the interim order for a forensic audit, considering allegations of serious lapses and non-compliance in financial statements and statutory compliances.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and Mismanagement - The Appellate Tribunal ...

Case Laws Companies Law

March 29, 2024

You may also like:

Oppression and Mismanagement - Transfer of Shares - allotment of shares - Forum Shopping - It is clear that even as on 1998, there was no business conducted by the...

Sale of property of the company to the third parties - oppression and mismanagement - it is quite clear that the even though the sales made in the years 2013 and 2014...

Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Violation of the Status quo order - This Tribunal comes to a resultant conclusion that while passing of status quo order it should be...

Oppression and mismanagement - the Tribunal has the power to make Interim Orders which it thinks fit for regulation of the conduct of the affairs of the Company -...

Oppression and Mismanagement - This ‘Tribunal’ keeping in mind of the ingredients of Section 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 comes to a resultant conclusion that...

Oppression and Mismanagement - bogus transactions - siphoning of funds - The allegation is an isolated incident and in order to invoke provisions of Oppression and...

The petition alleges oppression and mismanagement by the company's majority shareholders against the petitioners, who were removed as directors through an Extraordinary...

Oppression and Mismanagement - Allegations of financial mismanagement and irregularities by the promoters/directors - The High court acknowledged that despite the...

The crux of the matter revolves around allegations of oppression, mismanagement, illegal sale of company land, allotment of equity shares, appointment and removal of...

Respondents made a concession before the Regulatory Authority to accept interest only on amounts paid after RERA implementation. However, before the Appellate Authority,...

Mintainability of a company petition u/s 399 of the Companies Act, 1956, focusing on the pre-conditions envisaged under sub-sections (1) and (3). It examines whether the...

Oppression and mismanagement - misappropriation of funds - as such no irregularities were found in convening an Extra-Ordinary General Meeting which was requisitioned at...

Oppression and mismanagement - Removal of Director - Period of limitation - Time gap of 5 years - The petition filed by the petitioner is prima facie barred by...

Oppression and Mismanagement - the impugned order is a nonspeaking order. The question of Oppression, and Mismanagement, Maintainability and Limitation in the present...

Quick Updates: