Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2024 Year 2024 This

Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant ...

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy

April 13, 2024

Rejection of Section 7 Application filed by the Appellant (homebuyers) on the ground of non-compliance of Section 7, sub-section (1), 2nd Proviso - decree-holder is class of Financial Creditor or not - The tribunal noted that the appellants were only four in number, whereas the total units allotted were 488. The Code requires that a petition on behalf of homebuyers (as financial creditors in a class) is maintainable only if either 100 in number or 10% of the total allottees join the petition. The appellants did not meet this threshold. - Regarding the argument of Finacial Credit: the tribunal disagreed, referencing the definition under the IBC that includes financial creditors as those to whom a financial debt is owed. The tribunal highlighted that despite the RERA order, the appellants remained allottees and thus were required to meet the threshold set out u/s 7 of the Code.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Seized cash cannot be automatically released after 120 days u/s 132B's second proviso. This proviso applies only after the Assessing Officer determines the existing...

  2. Assessee filed second rectification application u/s 254, raising same grounds as first miscellaneous application which was already rejected. Tribunal held that except...

  3. Rejection of the refund application - rejection on the ground of time limitation - Defective refund application - The High Court held that, even assuming that the...

  4. Assessees subjected to search u/s 132 prior to March 31, 2021, retained the right to file applications for settlement before the Interim Settlement Board, provided such...

  5. The petitioner filed a refund application within the two-year limitation period for the year 2017-2018 on 17.09.2018, and subsequently filed a fresh refund application...

  6. The Appellate Tribunal examined whether there were sufficient grounds to recall its previous order dated 02.04.2024, wherein liberty was granted by the Supreme Court to...

  7. This case pertains to the precedence and priority of consideration between an application filed u/s 54(C) and Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC)...

  8. Rejection of Application for de-freezing the account of the company - The application filed by the petitioner-company for de-freezing the account was not opposed at any...

  9. Application for advance ruling rejected as questions raised were already pending in show cause notice proceedings under CGST/KGST Act. First proviso to Section 98(2)...

  10. Constitutional validity of the the proviso to Clause (26AAA) - A proviso cannot over arch a provision. - But in the instant case, the proviso is overriding the provision...

  11. The court examined whether the application filed by the State Bank of India against the personal guarantor u/s 95 was barred by limitation. It was held that even if no...

  12. Application u/s 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 maintainable only with court's liberty upon withdrawal of previous application. Principles of Order 23...

  13. Maintainability of Advance Ruling application - Classification of supply of service - rate of GST - In the applicant case, it is seen that the State authorities have...

  14. Online filing and processing of applications for export of Restricted items (Non-SCOMET) at DGFT HQ.

  15. Addition u/s 68 - non independent application of mind - accommodation entries - share application money - Mere non production of Director of said share holder company...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates