The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) rejected the ...

Case Laws GST

March 29, 2024

The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) rejected the classification under SAC Heading 9986 (support services to oil and gas extraction) and SAC Heading 9983 (other professional, technical, and business services relating to exploration, mining, or drilling of petroleum crude or natural gas) as proposed by the Appellant. Instead, it was held that the services provided under the EPC contract fall under SAC Heading 9954, related to construction services, and are thus taxable at 18%. The reasoning was based on the nature of the contract which encompasses comprehensive activities including surveying, designing, installation, commissioning, and handing over of a functional project, indicating the creation of an immovable property, characteristic of construction services. - Given the classification under SAC Heading 9954, the services are subject to GST at 18%.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling (AAAR) rejected the ...

Case Laws GST

March 29, 2024

You may also like:

Imported flow meters, pressure transmitters, level transmitters, parts and accessories were classified under tariff headings 9032 8990 and 9032 9000 or 9026 of Customs...

Challenged the Ruling pronounced by AAR - Nature of activities as per the EPC Contract - The AAAR concluded that the services provided by the appellant, involving the...

Classification of service - provision of service including supply of material amounting to transfer of property in goods - The Authority determined that the specific...

Classification of supply - survey, designing, installation and commissioning of project under EPC contract - The AAAR held that the services provided by the appellant...

Manual filing of applications for Advance Ruling and appeals before Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling

CESTAT Mumbai analyzed the case involving 'API supari' to determine the rate of duty and the applicability of Advance Ruling u/s 28J of Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal...

Classification of goods - preparation of Whole Wheat parota and Malabar parota - even if the applicant’s argument of classification of impugned products under heading...

Scope of Advance Ruling application - Payment of GST/tax/cess in the wrong head - applicability of interest for the intervening period - payment done under one Head...

Principles of Natural justice - late filing of return - intent to evade or not - it is the case of petitioner is that various aspects have not been dealt with or...

The subordinate authority is not empowered to supersede the orders passed by the appellate authority and an administrative discipline requires that the subordinate...

Classification of supply - rate of GST - outward supply - Agricultural Services or not - planting and nurturing of mangrove seeds and seedlings along with fruit trees in...

The applicant had suppressed material facts from the Authority for Advance Ruling by mis-declaring that the issue was not pending in any other proceedings, when in fact,...

The assessee-Respondent classified the aluminum circles under CTH 76069110 as raw materials, while the department proposed classification under CTH 7616, and the DRI...

Classification – Personal Digital Assistant (Data Processing Machine) - Heading 84713090 is more appropriate than Heading 84798999 - AT

Exemption of “Supply of Farm Labour” - supplier of manpower - The supply of manpower services falling under SAC 99851 is not exempted - the said notification is...

Quick Updates: