Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty u/s 270A - AO has disallowed the assessee’s claim of ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

April 4, 2024

Penalty u/s 270A - AO has disallowed the assessee’s claim of deduction u/s 24 and Chapter-VIA deduction as false claims - The appellant contested the penalty on various grounds, including lack of specificity in the penalty notice and attributing the underreporting of income to the actions of their tax consultant. Upon examination, the Appellate Tribunal found that the penalty was incorrectly imposed under section 270A(9)(e) for failure to record receipts in the books of accounts, despite the disallowance of deductions being the primary issue. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to delete the penalty.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  2. Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

  3. Depreciation on residential property - AO directed to allow depreciation as claimed by the assessee on residential premises, but verify the fact with regard to deduction...

  4. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  5. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal considered whether an assessee can claim deduction under Chapter VI-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the first time in the return...

  6. The ITAT Chennai ruled on LTCG deduction u/s 54, stating that investment in more than one property is not allowed. Assessee invested in two distinct properties in...

  7. The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

  8. The assessee failed to file the original return of income, and the Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings for underreporting income. The assessee's authorized...

  9. Deduction of interest u/s 24 - Since the assessee had not let out the house property, AO denied the claim of deduction u/s 24 - the question of using of personal...

  10. The ITAT Pune dealt with a case involving denial of standard deduction and Chapter VIA deductions u/s 80C. The appellant, an individual earning income under the head...

  11. Deduction u/s 80IA on the enhanced expenditures made to sub-contractors - The issue of the claim of higher deduction on the enhanced profits has been a contentious one....

  12. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowing deductions u/ss 54EC and 54F. Assessee admitted and withdrew incorrect claim u/s 54EC, constituting furnishing of...

  13. Deduction u/s 54F - LTCG - Out of these 24 flats, 15 flats are already sold in the present year and remaining 9 flats are likely to be sold within the period of three...

  14. Penalty u/s 270A was imposed by disallowing 30% of indexed cost of development expenses concerning Long Term Capital Gain offered by the assessee due to failure to...

  15. The Appellate Tribunal considered two issues: Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and u/s 270A. For the first, the Tribunal found the penalty notice defective as it did not specify...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates