Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - The AO held that loans received ...

Tribunal Rules Loan Additions Unwarranted, No Withdrawals Occurred, Assessee Favored Over AO's Deemed Dividend Claim.

April 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - The AO held that loans received by the assessee from the Company constituted deemed dividends. However, the Appellate Tribunal found that there were no withdrawals of loans during the relevant year, leading to the conclusion that the additions proposed by the Assessing Officer were unwarranted. Consequently, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee and deleted the proposed additions.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - The AO held that loans received ...

Tribunal Rules Loan Additions Unwarranted, No Withdrawals Occurred, Assessee Favored Over AO's Deemed Dividend Claim.

April 8, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT Kolkata held that the addition on a protective basis made by the Assessing Officer in the hands of the assessee, concerning a loan received from a director and...

Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on basis of loose papers on which name of the appellant was mentioned along with some other parties - The...

The ITAT held: Interest expenditure on unsecured loans is allowable deduction u/s 57(iii) as borrowed funds were utilized for advancing loans earning interest income,...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer erred in making additions u/s 68 for unsecured loans and disallowing interest component. The assessee demonstrated...

ITAT ruled in favor of assessee regarding unexplained money additions under s.69A for unsecured loan receipts. The tribunal found sufficient evidence proving loan...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

Addition u/s 56(2)(viib) - Method of Valuation - share premium receipts - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had obtained a valuation report from a registered valuer,...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, it ruled that disallowance of unpaid interest u/s 43B on a loan from the World Bank, advanced by the State...

Additions on account of Bogus unsecured loans and bogus share capital money - Revenue argued that the unsecured loan from entities controlled by a hawala operator should...

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - Addition u/s 69C on account of the capital introduced by the partner and unsecured loans - The Tribunal...

In the ITAT Delhi case, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on two key issues. Firstly, regarding unexplained cash deposits u/s 68, the AO's failure to...

The ITAT ruled on the addition u/s 68 of share capital/premium from three dummy entities related to RPS Group. The addition was substantive for RPS Group and protective...

Quick Updates: