Enhancement of assessment - Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(2) - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 19, 2024

Enhancement of assessment - Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(2) - addition u/s 56(2)(vii) - The appellant had received Rs. 25,00,000 as a security deposit from a developer, the amount was subsequently repaid - Providing / granting the appellant a reasonable opportunity to present their case against the enhancement - The Tribunal deemed this non-compliance as an irregularity rather than an illegality. However, the Tribunal decided to review the addition made under section 56(2)(vii) of the Act. It was determined that since the deposit received by the appellant was not without consideration, being related to a development agreement, the addition was not sustainable. Therefore, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned additions were directed to be deleted.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Enhancement of assessment - Power of CIT(A) u/s 251(2) - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

April 19, 2024

You may also like:

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

Provisional release of detained goods - The department's insistence on a 100% bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- was deemed arbitrary and onerous, especially considering...

Exemption limited increased to Rs. 25,00,000 against Leave encashment by the employees other than an employee of the Government - Income Tax Notification

Addition u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) - Purchase of property below circle rate / stamp value - since the assessee/co-owners has made part payment (part consideration of Rs. 3...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - Suo moto disallowance by assessee upheld, disallowance restricted to Rs. 2,00,000 for the year, following HT Media Ltd. decision....

Plaintiff contended defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending suit claim. Court held limitation issue raised by defendants requires further examination...

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 51.20 lacs as unexplained investment u/ss 69 or 56(2)(x)/6(2)(vii) was unjustified as there was no evidence of...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

Imported goods classification disputed - whether silver jewellery freely importable or restricted category under ITC (HS) Code 71069210. Court found respondent's...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

Quick Updates: