Addition of bogus sales - difference in opinion between learned ...

Tribunal Rules Sales Authentic During Demonetization, Rejects Unexplained Cash Credit Addition u/s 68.

April 19, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition of bogus sales - difference in opinion between learned Members constituting the bench - The appellate tribunal (Third Member) addressed the dispute arising from alleged bogus sales transactions during the demonetization period. The Assessing Officer treated these transactions as unexplained cash credit under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee sufficiently proved the authenticity of the sales through meticulous record-keeping and documentary evidence, despite challenges such as non-responses from some parties and allegations of sham transactions. - The Third Member upheld the decision of the learned Accountant Member to reject the addition under Section 68, considering the adequacy of evidence presented by the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition of bogus sales - difference in opinion between learned ...

Tribunal Rules Sales Authentic During Demonetization, Rejects Unexplained Cash Credit Addition u/s 68.

April 19, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT Delhi considered an addition u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE for cash deposited during demonetization as unexplained. The assessee's explanation of cash deposits from...

Addition u/s 69A - unexplained income - cash deposits made into bank account during demonetization period - assessee neither furnished stock summary nor bills/vouchers...

The appellant could not establish the source for cash deposits during demonetization. The Appellate Tribunal held that sales cannot be rejected solely based on higher...

The assessee's unexplained cash credits u/s 68 were deleted by the CIT(A) after accepting the submissions that the cash receipts from various sources like cash sales,...

Deposits by the assessee in bank account during demonetization period were not unexplained. Section 69A is inapplicable as there were proper entries for cash sales, cash...

Addition u/s 68 - unexplained cash towards cash deposits made during the demonetisation period - AO did not reject the books of accounts of the assessee and has not...

Rejection of books of accounts u/s 145 - Addition u/ss 68/69A with 115BBE - cash deposited during demonetization as unexplained credit. The Assessing Officer did not...

Unexplained cash credit addition u/s 68 during demonetization period - assessee unable to substantiate contentions regarding cash receipts from sales and debt recoveries...

Unexplained cash credits u/s 68 and the applicability of Section 115BBE for taxing such additions. The key points are: The Assessing Officer (AO) issued notices u/s...

AO accepted assessee company's books of accounts and net profit disclosed therein. However, AO treated cash deposits in bank accounts during demonetization period as...

Cash credit u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - cash deposit during demonetization period - assessee's failure to maintain books of accounts u/s 44AD. Held that where exemption from...

Unexplained cash deposits - Deposits in regular bank account of the assessee, during demonetization period - the assessee was maintaining complete stock tally, the sales...

The ITAT Bangalore addressed unexplained cash deposits u/s 69A, focusing on the credibility of earlier withdrawals as a source for redeposits. The Tribunal examined fund...

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

Unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - unexplained cash deposit in the bank account during post-demonetization period - Even otherwise the ld. AO should have appreciated that...

Quick Updates: