Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on ...

Tribunal Supports Assessee: Dismisses Tax Addition Due to Unsubstantiated Evidence and Insufficient Enquiries.

April 24, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on basis of loose papers on which name of the appellant was mentioned along with some other parties - The Assessee contested the addition, arguing that the documents lacked authenticity and were not maintained in the ordinary course of business. The Appellate Tribunal, after thorough review, upheld the Assessee's contention and dismissed the addition, citing lack of corroborative evidence and failure to conduct necessary enquiries. Thus, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the Assessee, allowing the appeal.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition in assessment u/s 153C - Addition u/s 69 - addition on ...

Tribunal Supports Assessee: Dismisses Tax Addition Due to Unsubstantiated Evidence and Insufficient Enquiries.

April 24, 2024

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the validity of reopening assessment under section 147 and addition under section 69A. The Tribunal held that the AO had sufficient...

The ITAT held that where the assessee entered into a unilateral Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and complied with its...

The Appellate Tribunal upheld the reopening of assessment u/s 147 due to the assessee providing bogus accommodation loss entries. The AO had reasons to believe in the...

The ITAT invalidated digital evidence seized during a search operation, specifically a pendrive, as inadmissible under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act. The...

The assessee university's application for registration u/s 10(23C)(vi) was rejected due to non-submission of audited accounts and failure to provide necessary...

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal u/s 249(4)(b) due to non-payment of advance tax. The assessee did not respond to the notice u/s 142(1) to clarify tax payment....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

The Appellate Tribunal addressed two key issues. Firstly, u/s 69A, the AO added sales to the assessee's income due to lack of evidence, despite the assessee providing...

Unsubstantiated and uncorroborated seized material alone cannot be considered conclusive evidence for additions u/s 69B. The words "may be presumed" in Section 132(4)...

Addition of cash deposits - ex-parte orders u/s 144 - When the appeal is filed before the appellate authorities by the assessee himself against the orders of the lower...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

ITAT Order Summary: The ITAT partially allowed the assessee's appeal, directing deletion of several additions and modifications to income calculations. Key outcomes...

ITAT reversed AO's addition under section 68 regarding alleged bogus long-term capital gains (LTCG). The tribunal found insufficient evidence to reject taxpayer's claim...

Assessee voluntarily declared income under "income from other sources" in return. AO disallowed deduction claimed for coordination and settlement expenses due to lack of...

Quick Updates: